问一道gemj的cr复习资料上的题/大全-D-5,大全-D-6

cfa · 发表于 2003-10-21 16:31:00

Test D的第5，6题
实在搞不太清楚，尤其是第5题
谢谢各位大侠们了
bow～～
Questions 5-6 are based on the following.
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, has unduly hampered law-enforcement efforts. Even when the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one, turning on a detail of procedure rather than on the abrogation of some fundamental liberty, and even when it has been clear that the police officers were acting in good faith, the evidence obtained has been considered tainted under this rule and may not even by introduced. In consequence, defendants who were undoubtedly guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again.
5. The author of the passage above assumes all of the following EXCEPT:
(A) The constitutional rights of criminal defendants should be protected.
(B) Most cases in which the exclusionary rule has been invoked have involved purely technical violations of constitutional principles.
(C) The number of cases whose outcome has been affected by the exclusionary rule is significant.
(D) Some of the defendants set free under the exclusionary rule have been guilty of serious criminal offenses.
(E) Merely technical violations of the rules concerning evidence should be treated differently from deliberate assaults upon human rights.
6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most likely endorse which of the following proposals?
(A) Change of the exclusionary rule to admit evidence obtained by police officers acting in good faith
(B) A constitutional amendment curtailing some of the protections traditionally afforded those accused of a crime
(C) A statute limiting the application of the exclusionary rule to cases involving minor criminal offenses
(D) Change of the exclusionary rule to allow any evidence, no matter how obtained, to be introduced in court
(E) A constitutional amendment allowing police officers to obtain vital evidence by any means necessary when in pursuit of a known criminal

答案：
B，A

cranberry · 发表于 2003-10-21 18:59:00

文章的意思是，尽管排除证据的原则的目的是好的，它禁止法庭采纳那些通过违反嫌疑人的宪法权利而得到的证据，但它却过多地影响了法律的实施。即使是很小的违反或者只是纯粹技术性的违反，或者对程序一丁点的圆转变通而不是剥夺了根本地自由，甚至即使事实表明警员是善意行事的，由此而得到的证据也会被认为是不正当而不被引入。结果就是，那些无疑犯了罪的嫌疑人被释放，然后可能继续偷窃、强奸，杀人。
我想有了中文意思，应该理解起来不困难了吧。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-10-21 19:00:14编辑过]

cfa · 发表于 2003-10-22 10:27:00

多谢，多谢啊
原来是我的阅读太差：）

春来江水绿如兰 · 发表于 2005-4-13 09:30:00

看了讨论的链接，对这两道题还是不理解。

1）有谁能解释一下5题的E为何不对？

我觉得挺有道理的：试想，如果要把技术性的侵犯和故意的人权侵犯区分开来，那么这种就得不到提干作者的结论——对被告的人权侵犯（非故意）阻碍了法律的实施。

2）有谁能帮我翻译一下6题中的B选项？

后半句不太理解其主动和被动关系。

多谢！！

春来江水绿如兰 · 发表于 2005-4-13 12:20:00

怎么没人回答？

泪如雨下。。。

晴天小狗 · 发表于 2006-10-14 12:00:00

第五题

A选项是因为有laudable所以要assumption?

C选项的significant从何而来？

为什么E选项要assume？

第六题 B选项怎么错了？

晴天小狗 · 发表于 2006-10-17 09:51:00

第五题

A选项是因为有laudable所以要assumption?

C选项的significant从何而来？

为什么E选项要assume？

第六题 B选项怎么错了？

晴天小狗 · 发表于 2006-10-19 17:50:00

第五题

A选项是因为有laudable所以要assumption?

C选项的significant从何而来？

为什么E选项要assume？

第六题 B选项怎么错了？

rebeccawkuo · 发表于 2008-9-20 17:40:00

5. The author of the passage above assumes all of the following EXCEPT:

(A) The constitutional rights of criminal defendants should be protected.

    forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation
            of the defendant’s [constitutional
        rights = permit the evidence which protect the defendant’s constitutional rights.]

(B) Most cases in which the exclusionary rule has been invoked have involved purely technical violations of constitutional principles.

正好相反: turn on a detail procedure rather than on the fundamental liberty. correct answer!

(C) The number of cases whose outcome has been affected by the exclusionary rule is significant. [=unduly過度地hampered law-enforcement efforts.]

(D) Some of the defendants set free under the exclusionary rule have been guilty of serious criminal offenses.[= 最後一句]

(E) Merely technical violations of the rules concerning evidence should be treated differently from deliberate蓄意 assaults攻擊 upon human rights. [= rather than on the abrogation廢除of some fundamental liberty]

问一道gemj的cr复习资料上的题/大全-D-5,大全-D-6