ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6809|回复: 16
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-13题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-2 01:41:00 | 只看该作者

OG-13题

Defense Department analysts worry that the ability of the United States to wage a prolonged war would be seriously endangered if the machine-tool manufacturing base shrinks furthur. Before the Defense Department publicly connected this security issue with the import quota issue, however, the machine-tool industry raised the  national security issue in its petition for import quotas.

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the machine-tool industry's raising the issue above regarding national security?

(A) When the aircraft industries retooled, they provided a large amount of work for tool builders.
(B) The Defense Department is only marginally concered with the effects of foreign competition on the machine-tool industry.
(C) The machine-tool industry encountered difficulty in obtaining govermental protection against imports on grounds other than defense.
(D) A few weapons important for defense consist of parts that do not require extensive machining.
(E) Several federal goverment programs have been designed which will enable domestic machine-tool manufacturing firms to compete successfully with foreign toolmakers.

答案为什么是C, 由谁能给翻译一下题干? 谢谢!
沙发
发表于 2004-2-2 02:48:00 | 只看该作者
提干:国防部分析认为m工业缩水导致国家安全问题。但是在国防部得出分析前,m工业就把国家安全问题作为(请求贸易壁垒的文书的)内容提交给国家。
     问:为什么m 工业会把国家安全问题列上去(在分析还没有出来之前)?
     C:除了国家安全问题,他们在其他问题上都无法要求到国家贸易保护。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-2 03:44:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 kid!
地板
发表于 2004-9-11 06:10:00 | 只看该作者

这道题的题干肯定是漏写了petition to reduce impot quotas.  

5#
发表于 2004-10-9 22:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fredshen在2004-9-11 6:10:00的发言:

这道题的题干肯定是漏写了petition to reduce impot quotas.  


楼上的理解错了!应该理解为现在对于进口的军火是没有任何限制的,如果国家给予进口配给制度的话,实际上是起到了对外国军火进口的限制作用。

不知道是否应该这样理解?


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-9 22:06:52编辑过]
6#
发表于 2005-1-26 11:59:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得不能这么理解,应当理解为:现在也有配额,只不过由于国内的MT工业规模缩减,所以国防部要考虑是否扩大配额,以保证美国国防安全。扩大配额可能又对国内的MT产生负面影响,MT没有合适的借口,可能国防安全是他们最好的借口。

7#
发表于 2005-6-10 00:45:00 | 只看该作者

关键是怎么理解这句话:raise the national security issue in its petition for import quotas.


反正我当时是没读懂,现在也没完全明白。

8#
发表于 2005-6-10 02:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用我爱欧洲在2005-6-10 0:45:00的发言:

关键是怎么理解这句话:raise the national security issue in its petition for import quotas.


反正我当时是没读懂,现在也没完全明白。


This sentence means that the industry uses the national security issue in its petition as a reason to ask for constraining import quotas. Because the less import quota is, the better the industry will be.  

Am I making sense or not?

9#
发表于 2005-6-10 08:11:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢,整个句子的意思明白了。raise这里是提出的意思,for import quotas就是要求进口配额。所以进口配额必定会导致进口减少。


这样理解对吧

10#
发表于 2005-6-10 10:37:00 | 只看该作者
yes.The industry wants to less the import quotas for its own interest purpose.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 15:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部