ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1189|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 20-12 怎么也想不明白,只能求教牛人了

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-17 21:37:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 20-12 怎么也想不明白,只能求教牛人了

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-

       1980’s that after the American Revolution

       (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican

Line       motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-

  (5)      cational opportunities for women in the

United States.  Kerber maintained that

the leaders of the new nation wanted

women to be educated in order to raise

politically virtuous sons.  A virtuous citi-

 (10)      zenry was considered essential to the

success of the country’s republican form

of government; virtue was to be instilled

not only by churches and schools, but

by families, where the mother’s role

 (15)      was crucial.  Thus, according to Kerber,

motherhood became pivotal to the fate

of the republic, providing justification for

an unprecedented attention to female

education.

 (20)            Introduction of the republican moth-

       erhood thesis dramatically changed

       historiography.  Prior to Kerber’s work,

educational historians barely mentioned

women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

 (25)      work is the notable exception.  Examining

newspaper advertisements for acade-

mies, Woody found that educational

opportunities increased for both girls

and boys around 1750.  Pointing to “An

 (30)      Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting

a shift in view, Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

       many advocates before the Revolution.

Woody’s evidence challenges the notion

 (35)
                       that the Revolution changed attitudes

regarding female education, although it

may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-

      lican motherhood” thesis may have

 (40)     obscured the presence of these trends,

making it difficult to determine to what

extent the Revolution really changed

women’s lives.

Q12:

The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?

             

  1. The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
  2. The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
  3. The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
  4. Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century
  5. Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

R:  D

W: B

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-18 10:54:00 | 只看该作者
up
板凳
发表于 2008-4-18 14:00:00 | 只看该作者

两个人分别是Revolution前后的观点,

都围绕对妇女教育问题态度重视程度的改变上,

侧重方向不同。

是选D,

Bprior to the American Revolution,错

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-4 14:10:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 ,刚看见,以为没人 理我了呢
5#
发表于 2008-8-6 12:48:00 | 只看该作者

把這題再翻出來一次跟大家討論 我個人還是傾向B 理由如下:

1)D是說whether women's educational opportunities changed during the 18th century 也就是說兩人對女性們的教育機會在18世紀是否有改變有爭議 可是事實上是有改變 只是一個說在revolution之前 一個說之後

2)B的話是說兩人對the extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the revolution有爭議 從文章裡可以找個到兩人的看法

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-

            1980’s that after the American Revolution

            (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican

Line     motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-

  (5)      cational opportunities for women in the

United States.

Pointing to “An

 (30)     Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting

a shift in view, Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

            many advocates
            before the Revolution.

advocate在這裡也可以當做support的意思

所以這樣子看來是不是B比較正確呢 請各位nn指教

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-19 05:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部