ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1784|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-I-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-27 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

大全-I-4

4.     Television programming experts maintain that with each 1% increase in the prime-time ratings of a television station there is a 3.5% increase in the number of people who watch its evening news program. However, in the last ten years at Channel NTR, there was only one year of extremely high prime-time ratings and during that year, fewer people than ever watched Channel NTR’s evening news program.

Which of the following conclusions can properly be drawn from the statements above?

(A) When a news program has good ratings, the channel as a whole will have good ratings.

(B) The programming experts neglected to consider daytime news programs.

(C) The year of high ratings at NTR was a result of two hit shows which were subsequently canceled because of contractual problems.

(D) The ten-year period in question is not representative of normal viewing patterns.E

(E) Prime-time ratings are not the only factor affecting how many people watch an evening news program.

答案为什么不能是D? 很有可能中国这十年情况特殊呀

沙发
发表于 2007-1-28 23:04:00 | 只看该作者

这十年的情况就算不具有代表性,但题目中强调的是其中一年的情况,而非10年,而且不具有代表性所产生的结论也不一定是题目中出现的情况

板凳
发表于 2007-1-29 11:16:00 | 只看该作者

Question is need to draw the conlusion based on the information given

We were told that 1% increse in prime-time,3.5% amount in people who watch TV.

But one time ,this principle does not work. what's the problem?

The problem is some other facts has affect how many people would watch tv except increasing in  prime-time.

E is the correct answer 

地板
发表于 2008-5-17 14:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用gonghao在2007-1-29 11:16:00的发言:

Question is need to draw the conlusion based on the information given

Yeah! To base on the information given is the key to draw conclusion.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-12 09:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部