ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2836|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请大家帮我分析这两个类似选项错在什么地方? GWD7-Q38&GWD17-Q9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-16 21:40:00 | 只看该作者

请大家帮我分析这两个类似选项错在什么地方? GWD7-Q38&GWD17-Q9

GWD7-Q38:

Journalist:  Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run.  However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission.  So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument?

A.      Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?

B.       Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?(是only way,不一定说明要参加选举;不是only way,不能说明不是要参加选举)

C.      Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?

D.      Have Bergeron’s financial holdings increased in value in recent years?

E.       Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?(因为他以前从没run过,所以可以根据这个评断)

 GWD17-Q9:
                        
CD-9 Q10

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

A.      Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

B.       The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

C.      The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.

D.      The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

E.       Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

GWD7的B选项和GWD17的A选项很相似,上一题我想通为什么错了,这题的A选项怎么错了?对A取非,cancelling highway projects是出于partisan politics的唯一途径,那不就是说明president's choice is motivated by partisan politics吗?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-17 21:08:00 | 只看该作者

有没有人帮我看看阿??

板凳
发表于 2009-5-19 06:41:00 | 只看该作者

Question 2

Answer is B.

This is for assumption not evaluation.

B eliminates the possibility that the projects can be controled by the government.

地板
发表于 2009-5-19 11:09:00 | 只看该作者
我的想法是Q1主要想证明submitting a list of holdings itself cannot prove that Bergeron will run for governor, b/c submitting a list of holding cannot say Bergeron is fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements.  因为 fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements 不一定只有着一种方法,  所以 submitting a list of holding 和fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements 没有必然联系!!他可能连fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements都没有履行,更加不用提后面的参加竞选了。  好绕人啊,自己看看吧,应该还是能弄明白的.

Q2题目想说president在打击对手党派,所以cancel了HY project。
A是说  cancel HY  project 不是president大家对手的唯一方法。可是题目中没有提到president做了其他事情大家其他党派
B. Cancel掉的 project不在presient党派执政的states,所以断定president此举只是为了击打其他党派. (毕竟federa少拨钱财给下面的states修建HY, 对于states是个损失么.)

两题不是一样的思路,所以想的时候不要被 the only way束缚~~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-19 14:40:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢angelautsuzy,我经常在我做题到一定程度时发一些莫名奇妙的帖子,连我自己后来都看不懂我当时在想什么。你很nice!!!~~~~谢谢!!

6#
发表于 2009-5-20 04:46:00 | 只看该作者
不客气啊~~大家共勉么~~
7#
发表于 2009-6-1 17:58:00 | 只看该作者
同问
8#
发表于 2009-7-20 08:51:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
发表于 2009-7-31 09:47:00 | 只看该作者

ding

10#
发表于 2009-8-4 11:43:00 | 只看该作者
頂一個再看討論..
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 04:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部