ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4964|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-A-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-16 15:50:00 | 只看该作者

大全-A-5

Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.

(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.

(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.

(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.

The key is B. I can understand why B is right, but I cannot figure out why E is wrong.

Who can help me out?

Thanks.

沙发
发表于 2007-6-16 18:30:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-16 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

我看过了,不过还是不是很清楚E为什么错了,

希望斑竹帮我解释一下,谢谢.

地板
发表于 2007-6-16 23:19:00 | 只看该作者

Johnson认为早期诗歌编辑都严重扭曲了D的作品,Johnson本人为了更忠实D的原意,自己开始编辑,在排版时,Johnson使用了破折号的语法形式使D的作品原有的诗韵的意境固定化,从而从另一角度扭曲D的原意。

作者的意思---定位Dickinson surely never expected to see in print.

A  作者没说Johnson对别人的评价是正确的

C 没说D从来不想发表

D  没说Johnson的材料不充足

E  没说Johnson和其他编辑都没充足地处对待翻译问题,至少Johnson还是更加忠实于原文了,说明还是充足处理翻译问题了

说点自己的想法,我觉得这题考细节的方式不像是真实考试中的细节题,这里的细节繁琐到炉火纯青的地步了,真是很绕,lz连问这两题,唉

说点自己的想法,我觉得这题考细节的方式不像是真实考试中的细节题,这里的细节繁琐到炉火纯青的地步了,真是很绕,lz连问这两题,唉
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-16 23:38:05编辑过]
5#
发表于 2007-6-17 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

J认为早期的Editor在编辑的时候曲解了D的意思,文中作者认为J在编辑时也同样曲解了D的意思。就是用dash那件事情。

E中破解D的手稿这件事情是J所为,但是原文中没有提到早期的Editor也干了此事。所以E中的Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson就不对了吧。

6#
发表于 2007-6-17 10:59:00 | 只看该作者

B

Jonhson同志觉的以前的某些编辑了dickson诗歌的人曲解了Dickson同志的意思。

但其实Johnson自己的东西里也在曲解,里面关于dash的使用其实是dickson同志不会使用的,那么这些出现在Jonhson同志关于Dickson诗歌的作品里的dash肯定会影响读者的判断。

E错

文章说:Johnson同志认为别人错了,但事实是Johnson同志自己的文章错了,John认为别人错,不代表别人就一定错。文章只谈论了Johnson同志自己的文章,无法推及所有的人都错了这个大范围。

7#
发表于 2008-6-1 23:37:00 | 只看该作者
发贴心情

B

Jonhson同志觉的以前的某些编辑了dickson诗歌的人曲解了Dickson同志的意思。

但其实Johnson自己的东西里也在曲解,里面关于dash的使用其实是dickson同志不会使用的,那么这些出现在Jonhson同志关于Dickson诗歌的作品里的dash肯定会影响读者的判断。

E错

文章说:Johnson同志认为别人错了,但事实是Johnson同志自己的文章错了,John认为别人错,不代表别人就一定错。文章只谈论了Johnson同志自己的文章,无法推及所有的人都错了这围。

上面是gonghao的看法,可是题中说“Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. ”但是说他 on firm ground  难道不是同一Johnson的说法吗? 希望有人讨论。

8#
发表于 2008-6-4 16:38:00 | 只看该作者

我原来也是这样想的, 所以选了A,

但是再看看, 第二句话,Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. 所以说 作者还是不同意J的. 就是说J和其他编辑都错了, 只是程度不同, J的更加faithful

来分析下几个选项:

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.   J与其他人错的程度不同

(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. 我觉得这个选项虽然可能对, 但不是作者的Mainpoint

(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. B)红字部分未提

(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.  文中没有提到 其他人试图decipher,

 

大家看看我这样想对不?

 

9#
发表于 2008-11-24 17:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dingxiang在2008-6-4 16:38:00的发言:

我原来也是这样想的, 所以选了A,

但是再看看, 第二句话,Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. 所以说 作者还是不同意J的. 就是说J和其他编辑都错了, 只是程度不同, J的更加faithful

来分析下几个选项:

(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.   J与其他人错的程度不同

(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. 我觉得这个选项虽然可能对, 但不是作者的Mainpoint

(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. B)红字部分未提

(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.  文中没有提到 其他人试图decipher,

 

大家看看我这样想对不?

大家看看我这样想对不?

 


                

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. 是poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print  不是poetry


                    
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts. 

the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions.不是所有情况?

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. 是poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print  不是poetry


        
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts. 

the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions.不是所有情况?

10#
发表于 2009-3-8 11:47:00 | 只看该作者
i
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 03:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部