ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1072|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

one question

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-21 06:18:00 | 只看该作者

one question

only an expert in some branch of psychology could understand why patrick is behaving irrationally. but no expert is certain of being able to solve someone else 's problem. patrick wants to devise a solution to his own behavior problem

which one of the following conclusions can be validly drawn from the passage?

1) patrick does not understand why he is behaving in this way.

2) patrick is not an expert in psychoogy

3) patrick is not certain of being able to devise a solution to his own behavioral problem

4) unless charles is an expert in some branch of psychlogy.charles shuld not offer a solution to patrick's behavioral problem

5) if charles is certain of being able to solve patrick's behavioral problem, then charles does not understand why patrick is behaving in this way

what will you choose? thanks

沙发
发表于 2008-7-22 21:46:00 | 只看该作者
5
板凳
发表于 2008-7-26 05:52:00 | 只看该作者
Formal logic question.

UPBI="understand why patrick is behaving irrationally"
EBP="some branch of psychology"
CASP="certain of being able to solve someone else 's problem"
E="expert"

From the stimulus we got:

UPBI--->EBP
E--->CASP not

Charles "charles is certain of being able to solve patrick's behavioral problem"= Charles CASP, Charles--->CASP--->E not = EBP not---> UPBI not.

That's 5.


地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-26 09:05:00 | 只看该作者
thanks 4 ur detail explanation.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 01:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部