ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3023|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

費費53題

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-19 00:07:00 | 只看该作者

費費53題

53. When investigators discovered that the director of a local charity had repeatedly overstated the number of people his charity had helped, the director accepted responsibility for the deception(欺騙). However, the investigators claims that journalists were as much to blame as the director was for inflating(使膨脹)the charity’s reputation, since they had naively(無邪的)accepted what the director told them, and simply reported as fact the numbers he gave them.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the investigators’ claim
(A) Anyone who works for a charitable organization is obliged to be completely honest about the activities of that organization.
(B) Anyone who knowingly aids a liar by trying to conceal the truth from others is also a liar.
(C) Anyone who presents as factual a story that turns out to be untrue without first attempting to verify that story is no less responsible for the consequences of that story than anyone else is.
(D) Anyone who lies in order to advance his or her own career is more deserving of blame than someone who lies in order to promote a good cause.
(E) Anyone who accepts responsibility for a wrongful act that he or she committed is less deserving of blame than someone who tries to conceal his or her own wrongdoing.

Answer:C

請問一下答案C的翻譯為何???

沙发
发表于 2003-11-19 01:17:00 | 只看该作者
不先核实,就把不实的事情作为事实报道出来,这个人比其他人都要对后果负责.
只有C最贴切
板凳
发表于 2003-11-19 01:33:00 | 只看该作者
简单一些说就是
如果A把一个没有确认过的事情当真事来说的话就也要对这件事情负责
记者就是犯了这个毛病,没有调查清楚就帮the director of a local charity 说话,结果让更多的人受骗,所以他就应该负责
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-28 04:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部