[求助]为什么我下的GWD31跟大家讨论的题目不一样??

刚才做了GWD第一套题目, 想去讨论区看阅读的讨论稿, 可是我的题目怎么跟大家的不一样啊??? 好郁闷啊！~~~大家可以帮我看看怎么回事么。。。

我第一篇阅读是这个:

Q4 to Q6:
        Prior to 1965 geologists assumed
 that the two giant rock plates meeting at
 the San Andreas Fault generate heat
Line through friction as they grind past each
  (5) other, but in 1965 Henyey found that
 temperatures in drill holes near the
 fault were not as elevated as had
 been expected.  Some geologists
 wondered whether the absence of
 (10) friction-generated heat could be
explained by the kinds of rock com-
posing the fault.  Geologists’ pre-1965
assumptions concerning heat gen-
erated in the fault were based on
 (15) calculations about common varieties of
rocks, such as limestone and granite;
but “weaker” materials, such as clays,
had already been identified in samples
retrieved from the fault zone.  Under
 (20) normal conditions, rocks composed of
 clay produce far less friction than do
 other rock types.
        In 1992 Byerlee tested whether
 these materials would produce friction
 (25) 10 to 15 kilometers below the Earth’s
surface.  Byerlee found that when clay
samples were subjected to the thou-
sands of atmospheres of pressure
they would encounter deep inside the
 (30) Earth, they produced as much friction
as was produced by other rock types.
The harder rocks push against each
 other, the hotter they become; in other
 words, pressure itself, not only the
 (35) rocks’ properties, affects frictional
 heating.  Geologists therefore won-
 dered whether the friction between the
 plates was being reduced by pockets
 of pressurized water within the fault that
 push the plates away from each other.

可是大家讨论的阅读是这个：

GWD-1-Q4 to GWD-1-Q6:

The fields of antebellum (pre-Civil
                

War) political history and women’s his-

tory use separate sources and focus

Line on separate issues. Political histori-

(5) ans, examining sources such as voting

records, newspapers, and politicians’

writings, focus on the emergence in the

1840’s of a new “American political

nation,” and since women were neither

(10) voters nor politicians, they receive little

discussion. Women’s historians, mean-

while, have shown little interest in the

subject of party politics, instead draw-

ing on personal papers, legal records

(15) such as wills, and records of female

associations to illuminate women’s

domestic lives, their moral reform

activities, and the emergence of the

woman’s rights movement.

(20) However, most historians have

underestimated the extent and signifi-

cance of women’s political allegiance

in the antebellum period. For example,

in the presidential election campaigns

(25) of the 1840’s, the Virginia Whig party

strove to win the allegiance of Virginia’s

women by inviting them to rallies and

speeches. According to Whig propa-

ganda, women who turned out at the

(30) party’s rallies gathered information

that enabled them to mold party-loyal

families, reminded men of moral values

that transcended party loyalty, and con-

ferred moral standing on the party.

(35) Virginia Democrats, in response,

began to make similar appeals to

women as well. By the mid-1850’s

the inclusion of women in the rituals of

party politics had become common-

(40) place, and the ideology that justified

such inclusion had been assimilated

by the Democrats.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

怎么回事？？ 很着急啊。。。是不是我下错了？？

我在这里下的：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=22&ID=84536&page=1

应该没错啊。。。帮帮我啊~~~~~~

多谢各位了！！~~~

可不可以那位好心人帮我看看呢~~~~~~多谢了!!