ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1209|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

政府购买武器的定价问题的一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-21 22:26:00 | 只看该作者

政府购买武器的定价问题的一道逻辑题

The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.

Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?

(A) The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.

(B) The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.

(C) The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.

(D) Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.

(E) The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

大全里面答案是 A,但是我记得以前见过的答案是E。做题目做的晕过去了,抓狂了

牛牛们。。。

沙发
发表于 2007-4-22 15:12:00 | 只看该作者
A
板凳
发表于 2007-4-22 16:46:00 | 只看该作者

Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?

I think the highlighted part leads us to the answer A.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-22 16:47:15编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-23 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

reasonable!

thx a lot, LS!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 23:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部