ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1366|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD 20-27 要考试了 急!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-21 11:58:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD 20-27 要考试了 急!

就要考试了,急啊~ 这题没看懂,大家帮忙解释一下 谢~

Q27:

A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty.  The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.  When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.

 

The argument above assumes which of the following?

 

  1. There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.
  2. There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.
  3. Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.
  4. Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
  5. There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily.

   Answer:  A

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-21 23:04:00 | 只看该作者

XDJM大家帮帮忙哦~~~~

板凳
发表于 2007-3-21 23:35:00 | 只看该作者

就是说,有一项修理工作需要这个公司完成,可他们做的不好,要返工。返工的产品合格了。于是分析原因说,返工比头一次做得好是由于concentration--即工人们比较重视和注意了。

如何体现工作成果的提高只是由于重视程度的提高?那就要排除其他原因(ceteris paribus)。

所以选项A中的假设:第一和第二次完成工作的工人基本是同样的。no systemetric difference in membership 就是为了强调两次完成工作的工人的相同点。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 14:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部