ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1324|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

最最混乱的文章.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-4 16:06:00 | 只看该作者

最最混乱的文章.

gwd11-Q35 to Q37:

Recent feminist scholarship con-
                    

cerning the United States in the 1920’s

challenges earlier interpretations that

Line assessed the twenties in terms of the

(5) unkept “promises” of the women’s

suffrage movement. This new scholar-

ship disputes the long-held view that

because a women’s voting bloc did not

materialize after women gained the right

(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to

produce long-term political gains for

women. These feminist scholars also

challenge the old view that pronounced

suffrage a failure for not delivering on

(15) the promise that the women’s vote

would bring about moral, corruption-

free governance. Asked whether

women’s suffrage was a failure, these

scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-

(20) century social reformer Jane Addams,

“Why don’t you ask if suffrage in

general is failing?”

In some ways, however, these

scholars still present the 1920’s as a

(25) period of decline. After suffrage, they

argue, the feminist movement lost its

cohesiveness, and gender conscious-

ness waned. After the mid-1920’s, few

successes could be claimed by fem-

(30) inist reformers: little could be seen in

the way of legislative victories.

During this decade, however, there

was intense activism aimed at achiev-

ing increased autonomy for women,

(35) broadening the spheres within which

they lived their daily lives. Women’s

organizations worked to establish

opportunities for women: they strove to

secure for women the full entitlements

(40) of citizenship, including the right to hold

office and the right to serve on juries.

Q36:

It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the

  1. degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept
            
  2. degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance
            
  3. degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement
            
  4. degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s
            
  5. accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved

Answer: d

谁可以解释一下这片文章大体思路呢? 第二段一个however,第三段又在开始出现一个however,貌似作者绕个圈还是赞成traditonal idea哦..可是还是不好选...郁闷

 

沙发
发表于 2007-3-7 15:45:00 | 只看该作者

前面在列举最近一些妇女运动学者的观点和以往的不同,

In some ways, however, these scholars still present the 1920’s as a

(25) period of decline. After suffrage, they argue, the feminist movement lost its cohesiveness, and gender consciousness waned. After the mid-1920’s, few successes could be claimed by fem-

(30) inist reformers: little could be seen in the way of legislative victories. 这一句基本是总结前面的观点。

During this decade, however, there was intense activism aimed at achieving increased autonomy for women,

(35) broadening the spheres within which they lived their daily lives. Women’s organizations worked to establish opportunities for women: they strove to secure for women the full entitlements

(40) of citizenship, including the right to hold office and the right to serve on juries。这最后一句是作者自己的观点。他认为20年代在妇女法律权利方面还是有进步和贡献的。

板凳
发表于 2007-3-7 15:47:00 | 只看该作者
文章就是第一句话有点绕,但这句话并不重要
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-3-21 08:54:00 | 只看该作者
Thank you so much puti1971!!! Your explaination is so excellent..........
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-10 09:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部