- UID
- 592379
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-12-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
寒假没事上来瞎搞一下, 主旨如题 20110627 Background knowledge: Peter Lynch Fidelity's Magellan Fund dot.com share price's contributors dividend v.s. future growth Lynch parlance: tenbagger
Content: Rule of the thumb: Research, Research, Research
Most dot.coms only have p without e (pe ratio)
Just because it is your favorite store or brand, it does not mean you have to put your money in. (e.g. Apple)
A company's shares could just dropped, dropped, dropped - "a cheap stock can always get cheaper." it might raise again, "but assuming that will happen is wishing, not investing"
多半的结局是东西写的半拉拉的丢在这里,继续看我的书...
p.s. One up on Wall Street... 眼下的读后感,就当是重温corporate finance: theory and practice.... for that subject: Brealey's Principles of Corp. Fin. helps heaps. 看明日还来否... 我承认,我刚考完试闲的 |
|