3-22 Letter to the editor: After Baerton’s factory closed, there was a sharp increase in the number of claims filed for job-related injury compensation by the factory’s employees. Hence there is reason to believe that most of those who filed for compensation after the factory closed were just out to help them weather their job loss. Each of he following , if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT (A) Workers cannot file for compensation foe many job-related injuries, such as hearings loss from factory noise, until they have left the job (B) In the years before the factory closed, the factory’s managers dismissed several employees who has filed injury claims (C) Most workers who receive an injury ion the job file for compensation on the day they suffer the injury (D) Workers who incur partial disabilities due to injuries on the job often do not file foe compensation because they would have to stop working to receive compensation but cannot afford to live on that compensation alone. (E) Workers who are aware that they will soon be laid off from a job often become depressed, making them more pone to job-related injuries
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-11-5 17:58:00
