ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1514|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这题狒狒和GWD答案有出入

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-14 17:44:00 | 只看该作者

这题狒狒和GWD答案有出入

Q27:

Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
  2. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
  3. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
  4. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
  5. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

GWD里答案是A    狒狒里答案是C    应该是哪个呀..NN指点


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-14 17:45:37编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2006-10-14 21:52:00 | 只看该作者

我选C.取非削弱..

但是这道题还是挺晕的.也许今天做题有点多.

板凳
发表于 2006-10-15 12:07:00 | 只看该作者

Why C?

取非似乎是支持结论。

地板
发表于 2006-10-15 12:42:00 | 只看该作者

C.

"The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released." ==> Little negative impact of the governor's action  ==> Original argument weakened.

5#
发表于 2006-10-15 13:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用robertchu在2006-10-15 12:42:00的发言:

C.

"The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released." ==> Little negative impact of the governor's action  ==> Original argument weakened.

???????????

inmates less likely  to commit crimes

governor's ultimate goal"reduce the crime rate"不是一致吗?

6#
发表于 2006-10-15 23:47:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得选A

C项否定了since后面的内容,是否定前提吧,狒狒说不能否定前提啊

7#
发表于 2006-10-16 00:07:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得这道题是表达Newspaper editorial的argument  :认为Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However(表递进), this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal何谓ultimate goal就是要降低犯罪率          也就是说上课还是有用的      c的意思是说  那些上课的人 在上课之前 已经(比那些不上课的人)already less likely再犯罪了   所以说上课还是有用
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 10:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部