ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2267|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]boldface 第四题 第七题 Ps.下星期就要考了,拜托帮忙解惑一下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-19 12:26:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]boldface 第四题 第七题 Ps.下星期就要考了,拜托帮忙解惑一下


4.


重点观念澄清:请教大家inference conclusion有何不同,是不是inference是可从题目说的前因后果所得到结论,只是对文章中的句子进行同义字代换,而conclusion是结论中包含一些题目没有说到的观念,请各位指正,谢谢


请问第四题答案D的后半有错吗?不可以说是inference 一定要如答案E所说是conclusion吗?我确定不选D的原因是因为前半错了,the first并不是the part of premise,因为这样的说法表示consequently 以前都是premise,错,因为题目的第一句话是fact,不是premise


More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles. Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.
The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?  


(A) The first is the second-premise that the argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.
(B) The first is the fact that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage.
(C) The first is the part of premise that the argument includes; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(D) The first is the part of evidence that supports this argument; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(E) The first is the first conclusion in this argument; the second is the second conclusion in this argument.


Ans: E



7. 为什么the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains. 为什么不能从原文证据推断出这个结论,我觉得可以阿!疑惑为什么答案不是the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.



To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.


The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.
(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.
(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.
(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.
(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.


Ans: A

沙发
发表于 2004-7-19 13:28:00 | 只看该作者

嗯,第一个题目我也有类似的问题。


第二个题目应该是那个must的问题,这个人并不是必须成为member的,只是eligible.所以后面一句应该是无法得到的结果吧。



还请高手指点。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-21 00:10:00 | 只看该作者

感谢你的指点,一语道醒梦中人,现在总算弄清楚了


地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-21 00:22:00 | 只看该作者

还请各位牛人替我解答第一题的重点观念澄清,感谢,感觉boldface很多题目中都与这观念有关,这观念困扰我很久。

5#
发表于 2004-7-21 01:22:00 | 只看该作者

1。INFERENCE和CONCLUSION区别:前者从原文经过逆否命题或演绎或其它MUST BE TRUE的方法推出来。后者指原文要表达的中心思想。

2。原文是因果关系,不存在MUST BE TRUE的推理,所以凡有INFERENCE的统统错。排除C,D。B的NECCESARY也错(是MUST BE TRUE推理)

3。在没有E的情况下,A可勉强算答案。但因为原文第1,2句存在因果关系。所以E更准确。

6#
发表于 2006-7-10 19:41:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢律师大人。

7#
发表于 2006-10-4 18:10:00 | 只看该作者

inference和conclusion还真是不好区别.

看了BF9道题和NN们的总结后有点感想:

inference一般发生在conclusion之后

inference所含的内容都是文章已经有的,并无创新扩展(不含新名词,新概念).

welcome discussion

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-12 01:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部