This is what I am confused with: Does better performers mean people who are good at recognizing abstract pattern, people who can efficiently select another design to complete or people who can recognize a pattern and then select another design that completes that pattern?
You think too much. In this stimulus there are only two kinds of people: better & worse.
I guess I am still not quite understand the meaning of "Human subjects recognized a pattern within a matrix of abstract designs and then select another design that completes that pattern"
If more option,like the example I made up in the following, is provided, can I consider it as right one?
F) People who are better at selecting a design to complete a abstract pattern have more energ-efficient neural connections.
yes |