请教BU，ASU，Rotman哪个好？

ph12111211 · 发表于 2006-3-11 15:39:00

收到Offer，难下决心，不知道BU到底怎样？对Boston这个城市非常向往。但是ASU的排名好些。另外，Rotman 和这两个学校比较又如何？

请牛牛们不吝赐教。

funnytiger · 发表于 2006-3-12 04:00:00

Ok, ok, Rotman is in Canada, right? let us put this one off the paper

Next, ASU and BU. location wise, BU is better. service wise, BU is a private school while ASU is second tier public school in the state of Arizona.

Verdict: BU

lyw4u2005 · 发表于 2006-3-12 04:12:00

ASU离加州很近，如果毕业后想在加州找份IT行业的工作，应该有点优势；BU地理位置之好当然务容置疑了，尤其是金融和咨询业机会很多，如果意欲从事这方面的工作，BU是首选。
就声望而言，两所学校没什么差别。LZ应该再关注一下学科的排名。My $0.02。

ph12111211 · 发表于 2006-3-12 05:42:00

Thanks!

But some people consider Rotman the number one in Canada. Its ranking in Financial Times is 24, while BU ranks at 50.

Does any one know about the Rotman alumni's networks in the States? Is it hard for a Canadian graduates to find a job in the States?

funnytiger · 发表于 2006-3-12 05:53:00

Assuming that you are in China and you have two candidates applying for a position under you.

1. Person A graduated from SiChuan Unviersity.

2. Person B graduated from the No.1 University from Thailand.

I don't mean to be disrespectful. Unless you want to stay in Canada, go to a US school.

ph12111211 · 发表于 2006-3-12 06:18:00

En, make lot of sense. Thanks!

ph12111211 · 发表于 2006-3-12 06:34:00

如果回国工作呢，哪个好些？

yorkzhong · 发表于 2006-3-12 09:10:00

以下是引用ph12111211在2006-3-12 6:34:00的发言：

如果回国工作呢，哪个好些？

there's no big difference of US 2-tier school and Canada school, in our company, we have both and they are paied same.

blahblah · 发表于 2006-3-12 09:14:00

在美国人看来，大多人会把Toronto看成美国的一个城市吧，因此我想刚才四川和泰国的例子可能不准确。

ph12111211 · 发表于 2006-3-13 02:19:00

Thanks for everyone's contributions. I think the key issue here is how American company recruiters evaluate a Canadian MBA degree.

The top Canadian school = the second tier US school?

Still in a dilemma...Your suggestions are highly valued