ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (OIGA)

00:00:00

Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged 87 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant, at an average of 95 admissions per 1,000 beds per year. Between 1985 and 1988, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 92 percent of capacity, while admission rates declined to 81 per 1,000 beds per year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5087|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-145

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-7 06:40:00 | 只看该作者

OG-145

连接我已经全部看过,但没有对C的讨论,所以才发的贴.


请高手予以支持


沙发
发表于 2005-6-7 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

重新发帖的话,请MM把题目贴全啊。

板凳
发表于 2005-6-9 23:28:00 | 只看该作者

145. Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged 87 percent of capacity,



while admission rates remained constant, at an average of 95 admissions per 1,000 beds per



year. Between 1985 and 1988, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 92 percent of



capacity, while admission rates declined to 81 per 1,000 beds per year.



If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly



drawn?



(A) The average length of time nursing-home residents stayed in nursing homes increased



between 1985 and 1988.



(B) The proportion of older people living in nursing homes was greater in 1988 than in



1975.



(C) Nursing home admission rates tend to decline whenever occupancy rates rise.



(D) Nursing homes built prior to 1985 generally had fewer beds than did nursing homes



built between 1985 and 1988.



(E) The more beds a nursing home has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.


我也选的c,请nn帮忙解释一下,谢谢!

地板
发表于 2005-6-10 02:35:00 | 只看该作者

I think the answer is A, rite?


There is a paradox in this problem, the higher admission rate, the lower occupancy, while the lower adimssion rate, the higher occupancy.Only A can explain why this could happen. Because people stay in nursing house for a longer time than ever, that's why lower admission rate can still cause the increasing number of people in the nursing house gradually.



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-10 23:20:12编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-6-11 15:53:00 | 只看该作者
C的意思是说任何时候occupancy rate升高, admission rate就升. OG解释说题干里并没有说明1975-1985年发生的情况是正常的还是不正常的, 所以不能作出C这样的推理.
6#
发表于 2005-6-11 16:45:00 | 只看该作者

C在说occupancy与admission之间的因果关系,但原文只是两种现象的同时发生,没有因果关系。

7#
发表于 2005-7-16 11:28:00 | 只看该作者
UP
8#
发表于 2005-9-24 17:10:00 | 只看该作者

可我认为这两者的确存在此增彼长的关系啊


不选是因为whenever太绝对,这样的答案一般是错的?

9#
发表于 2005-9-25 13:16:00 | 只看该作者

问题问的是从现象可以得出哪项推论是正确的。现象:1985-1988,occupancy rate rose while admission rate fell. 结论:c选项说admission rate decline whenever occupancy rate rose. 从一个现象推出一个很绝对的规律,不对,是hasty generalization.

10#
发表于 2005-12-16 12:25:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 05:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部