ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2179|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 8-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-2-10 01:15:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 8-3

In the late 1980's, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline---increased predation by killer whales or disease---disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution-related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?
A. Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
B. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980's
C. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980's, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
D. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters' main food source.
E. The North Pacific populations of seal and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population sea otter.


SEA OTTER的减少有两个原因,一是被KILLER WHATLE吃掉,二是疾病---更被人们认同。(因为) SEALS AND SEA LIONS 的骤减就很可能是污染有关的疾病造成的,而此疾病可能已扩散到SEAL OTTER。而KILLER WHALES的数量并没有明显改变。


感觉题意不太清楚,KILLERWHALES的数量与REASOING没有关联啊?请各位NN赐教!多谢!

沙发
发表于 2006-2-10 08:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sunforest在2006-2-10 1:15:00的发言:

In the late 1980's, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline---increased predation by killer whales or disease---disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution-related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?
A. Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
B. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980's
C. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980's, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
D. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters' main food source.
E. The North Pacific populations of seal and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population sea otter.


SEA OTTER的减少有两个原因,一是被KILLER WHATLE吃掉,二是疾病---更被人们认同。(因为) SEALS AND SEA LIONS 的骤减就很可能是污染有关的疾病造成的,而此疾病可能已扩散到SEAL OTTER。而KILLER WHALES的数量并没有明显改变。


感觉题意不太清楚,KILLERWHALES的数量与REASOING没有关联啊?请各位NN赐教!多谢!


答案是A吗?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-2-10 10:33:00 | 只看该作者

Yeah, the answer is A, but how come?tks!

地板
发表于 2006-2-11 11:05:00 | 只看该作者

原文说O的减少因为disease, A说O的减少有可能是杀鱼吃的(暗是不一定是disease)


大概是这意思. LZ再仔细看看.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-2-12 13:00:00 | 只看该作者

ok,I see. Thank you,wycg!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 01:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部