我的逻辑实在是太菜了,做费费一个小test18道要错8个,郁闷的要死!12月初就要考了,请大家帮帮忙,看看我的思路到底是哪里出问题了...谢谢!先看一个吧
20. A rise in the percentage of all 18-year-olds who were recruited by the armed services of a small republic between 1980 and 1986 correlates with a rise in the percentage of young people who dropped out of high school in that republic. Since 18-year-olds in the republic are generally either high school graduates or high school dropouts, the correlation leads to the conclusion that the republic’s recruitment rates for 18-year-olds depend substantially on recruitment rates for high school dropouts.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A. A large number of 18-year-old high school graduates were recruited for the republic’s armed services in 1986 than in 1980.
B. Many of the high-technology systems used by the republic’s armed services can be operated only by individuals who have completed a high school education.
C. Between 1980 and 1986 the percentage of high school graduates among 18-year-olds recruited in the republic rose sharply.
D. Personnel of the republic’s armed services are strongly encouraged to finish their high school education.
E. The proportion of recruits who had completed at least two years of college education was greater in 1986 than in 1980.
这个题目答案是选c没有问题,可是我怎么觉得a,b都没有办法排除呢?我错选了第2个,因为觉得也是个削弱啊.因为如果 Many of the high-technology systems used by the republic’s armed services can be operated only by individuals who have completed a high school education,那么就直接说明了,就业招聘的人员组成不是退学的,所以就削弱了...
要不开篇的那个关于army的例子有什么作用呢??? |