|
A new state-sponsored tax law aimed at increasing the state’s college attendance rate gives local public universities tax incentives to encourage acceptance of a greater percentage of applicants from within the state. Legislators supporting the new law believe that it will not only allow more students from the state to obtain further education, but also provide a strong financial boost to in-state universities.
Which of the following, if true, would provide the strongest critique of the legislators' proposal?
(A) Public universities receive the majority of their funding through state-sponsored initiatives.
(B) Public universities are generally less expensive than private universities.
(C) Many college applicants find that relocating to a new state is the single largest obstacle to attending college.
(D) Public universities feel that having a broader applicant pool is more financially beneficial than the incentives provided under the new law.
(E) Applications to universities within the state reached an all-time high for the previous academic year.
这个题，我有疑问的有两个地方：
①谁是conclusion句，谁是premise句呢？（是怎么判断出来的？）
②到底反驳点是什么？（是new law不该实行，还是new law的applicant并没有增加，而是减少；又或者是后面的两个好处的反驳；）我都有点晕了，不知道到底应该反驳哪一个点，给的点太多了（new law该不该实行？还是applicant的多少？还是financial boost？）
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2019-1-17 09:26:18
收藏
收藏
楼主