求助 一道让人头痛的逻辑题

when hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist ,they reply ,'no'.some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts,and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

a why dose the part that replies not answer,'yes'

b why are the observe facts in need of any special explanation?

c why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?

d why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described ?

e why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

answer A

这道题到底weaken什么我一头雾水，而且原文也没太读懂，请牛牛们帮忙啊，谢谢了

我觉得它的意思是催眠师向你心里暗示:"你聋了."之后再问你:"听得见我吗?"病人说"听不见."这就很奇怪了,你听不见怎么知道他的问题的.作者的解释是聋的部分是聋了(被催眠的,缥缈的状态),回答的部分还function的,这两部分是分开的,所以他又能真的被催眠了,又能回答医师.

提出的weaken他的论点的就是,如果回答的那部分没有被催眠,是分开的,还能function,那它怎么不说实话呐~~~~~~(即听到问题了还说no)

记得原来有人不接我电话,一接通发现是我,就说:"啊, 啊, 什么,听不见啊..."在那边装信号不好,然后我说:"那我等会儿再打给你."她马上就说:"哦,好!"和这个同理.作者就是想说类似与这个接电话的人,患者可能表现出自相矛盾的反应,但是他们不是存心的(不像这个接电话的),他们是真的自身被一分为二,不受左右了.

看能不能把你说明白.