- UID
- 1163761
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-10-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
贴一下考古
The school introduced a bicycle loaning (注意这个bicycle loan,很关键)program which is aimed at encouraging students to ride bicycle toschools instead of driving. The school claims that the program is effectivesince 1 in 10 students ride bicycles to school now, in comparison to 1 in 100previously. And the students who drive (or take their parents’ cars) to schooldecreased from 25% to 10%.
Weaken
The choice I chose: E. most of thestudents who previously take their parents’ car to school regularly alreadyown bicycles. (理由:要weaken的关键在于attack the school’s claim that the bicycle loaning program is effective.所以E选项就说原来那些开车上学的孩子大部分本身就有自行车,所以推出借自行车根本就不可2能成为他们改骑车上学的原因,也就推翻了这个Program有效的结论。
这一题答案应该是学生人数减少吧,他因削弱,
有车的孩子有自行车这个选项,并没有提出变化的原因,一直存在的事情应该不能影响一个变化,虽然不能说program让他们去买车,但是可以成为鼓励他们骑自行车的理由
逻辑有点混乱。。。。知道意思就好
|
|