ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2577|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat 6 -2-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-21 19:59:00 | 只看该作者

lsat 6 -2-5

5.    The museum’s night security guard maintains that the thieves who stole the portrait did not enter the museum at any point at or above ground level. Therefore, the thieves must have gained access to the museum from below ground level.
The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?
(A) The rules stipulate the participants in the contest be judged on both form and accuracy. The eventual winner was judged highest in neither category, so there must be a third criterion that judges were free to invoke.
(B) The store’s competitors claim that the store in selling off the shirts at those prices, neither made any profit nor broke even. Consequently, the store’s customers must have been able to buy shirts there at less than the store’s cost.
我选1答案给2
想不通需要解释
沙发
发表于 2003-11-21 22:56:00 | 只看该作者
论据是当事人之一(保安)说的,他可能为自己开脱,所以结论must ....是unfounded.
2中                    (competitor)
板凳
发表于 2005-8-11 11:50:00 | 只看该作者

(A) The rules stipulate the participants in the contest be judged on both form and accuracy. The eventual winner was judged highest in neither category, so there must be a third criterion that judges were free to invoke.
而且,判断依据为“both form and accuracy”,并不是说一定要highest in both,可能只是f(form,accuracy),因此并不一定有第三个标准。


而题干的例子,是完全不相容的criterions,否定两category,就只有其它标准了。

地板
发表于 2005-8-11 12:27:00 | 只看该作者

题目和选项B都是:


声称一件事情,然后结论MUST BE 这件事情(同一事情的不同说法);


而A的结论实际上对其前面所说的事情,提出了另一种解释。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-12 05:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部