90. (25002-!-item-!-188;#058&001132) X: In order to reduce the amount of plastic in landfills, legislatures should impose a ban on the use of plastics for packaging goods. Y: Impossible! Plastic packaging is necessary for public safety. Consumers will lose all of the safety features that plastic offers, chiefly tamper-resistant closures and shatterproof bottles. Which of the following best describes the weak point in Y's response to X's proposal? 我是这么理解的,这个其实也可以看成是果因结构,然后他因削弱,不过我在选项中纠结了很久,上CD也没找到很充分的解释 A. Y ignores the possibility that packaging goods in materials other than plastic might provide the same safety features that packaging in plastic offers. B. The economic disadvantages of using plastics as a means of packaging goods are not taken into consideration.(out of space) C. Y attempts to shift the blame for the large amount of plastic in landfills from the users of plastic packaging to the legislators. (没看懂) D. Y does not consider the concern of some manufacturers that safety features spoil package appearances. (out of space) E. Y wrongly assumes that X defends the interests of the manufacturers rather than the interests of the consumers.(X也没有保护生产商啊)
做的时候在五个选项里排除后又纠结很久,觉得还是找不到这种题的突破口,而且觉得这个题的逻辑链很奇葩……
C选项不知道怎么解释只知道感觉好像与这题没啥关系,期待解答 |