ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1709|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全 B-16 请NN指点

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-7 09:43:00 | 只看该作者

大全 B-16 请NN指点

        Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.


Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?


(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.


(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.


(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.


(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.A


(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.


A 是怎么WEAKEN  的呢?实在有点不明白?但别的选项又确实是无关选项?HELP

沙发
发表于 2005-6-7 09:57:00 | 只看该作者
夏麦,你先告诉我,你认为本题的结论是哪一句话?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-7 10:05:00 | 只看该作者
However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. 是不是这句啊?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-7 10:07:00 | 只看该作者
哦,我好象明白了.A 指出了事实,说明它不是虚构的,就削弱了,是不是啊?
5#
发表于 2005-6-7 10:34:00 | 只看该作者
对,结论是,complaints荒谬。要削弱这个结论,就要说,complaints是有道理的,也就是说,要支持suits让businesses产生了损失。只有A达到了这个要求--虽然成功的suits没有变化,但是不成功的suits大量增加,一样增加了businesse的成本。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-1 00:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部