help

wpeng82 · 发表于 2003-8-15 14:04:00

og上的最后一道题：
consumer advocate:it is generally true,at least in this state,that lawyers who advertise a specific serverse charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise.it is also true that each time restraictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminted,the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence.however,eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumers' legal costs.lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begn advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements,many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.
答案是：
the first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue;the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
我看了几遍，都看不懂，nn们解释一下：3x先

wpeng82 · 发表于 2003-8-15 16:11:00

忘了加粗了，以下是补丁：

consumer advocate:it is generally true,at least in this state,that lawyers who advertise a specific serverse charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise.it is also true that each time restraictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminted,粗体1开始：the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence.粗体1结束however,eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumers' legal costs.粗体2开始：lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begn advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements,many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.
答案是：
the first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue;the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
我看了几遍，都看不懂，nn们解释一下：3x先

八戒 · 发表于 2003-8-15 16:37:00

这是句子作用题！

如果你能在G中考到这种题目.....恭喜，你中大奖拉！！
呵..........很难遇到的！！

还是狒狒的观点，看划线部分（或则粗体）是evidence还是conclusion
然后通过之间的转折连词来判断关系！

句子意思其实可以根本不用关他！！

wpeng82 · 发表于 2003-8-15 17:08:00

thanks

help

help

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块