ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2667|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]XDF补充材料上的最新机考题(一)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-23 11:15:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]XDF补充材料上的最新机考题(一)

146.Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that thae planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's  bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.


The argument depends on assuming which of the following?


A. Apart from development related to the pipeline, ther will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.


B. Other than the possibility of a leak, ther is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipelines's constrction.


C. Ther is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective twhen installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa.


D. Damage to the lake's fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would casue.


E. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.


Key:B


请大家讨论一下C的错误:There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective twhen installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa. 是不是因为文中已经指明:"provided this technology is effective",所以无需考虑技术的有效性问题?


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-4-23 22:19:00 | 只看该作者

I am looking up

you are showing up

and then we both cheering up

'coz the problem has been ended up

But what i can do now is only up up up......

板凳
发表于 2005-4-24 07:40:00 | 只看该作者
你是对的,原文的结论是有前提的,所以不必要再假设这个前提。比如你说:如果我一天24小时在CD上,就能考800分。你不必假设你一天能24小时在CD上。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-4-24 10:44:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks, Lawyer,
5#
发表于 2005-5-8 00:27:00 | 只看该作者

问一下 a 为什么不对? 对a取非就是说有别的工厂会产生污染 削弱结论......

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 16:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部