ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8803|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 12- 24,25 ,多谢!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-11 01:16:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 12- 24,25 ,多谢!!

Q24 to Q27:


     Years before the advent of plate


       tectonics―the widely accepted theory,


       developed in the mid-1960’s, the holds


Line       that the major features of Earth’s surface


  (5)      are created by the horizontal motions


of Earth’s outer shell, or lithosphere―


a similar theory was rejected by the


geological community.  In 1912, Alfred


Wegener proposed, in a widely debated


(10)      theory that came to be called continental


drift, that Earth’s continents were mobile.


To most geologists today, Wegener’s


The origin of Continents and Oceans


appears an impressive and prescient


(15)      document, containing several of the


essential presumptions underlying plate


tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility


of pieces of Earth’s crust; the essential


difference between oceanic and conti-


(20)      nental crust; and a causal connection


       between horizontal displacements and


       the formation of mountain chains.  Yet


despite the considerable overlap


between Wegener’s concepts and the


(25)      later widely embraced plate tectonics


theory, and despite the fact that conti-


nental drift theory presented a possible


solution to the problem of the origin of


mountains at a time when existing expla-


(30)      nations were seriously in doubt, in its


day Wegener’s theory was rejected


by the vast majority of geologists.


             Most geologists and many historians


today believe that Wegener’s theory


(35)     was rejected because of its lack of an


adequate mechanical basis.  Stephen


Jay Gould, for example, argues that


continental drift theory was rejected


because it did not explain how continents


(40)      could move through an apparently solid


oceanic floor.  However, as Anthony


Hallam has pointed out, many scientific


phenomena, such as the ice ages, have


been accepted before they could be fully


(45)      explained.  The most likely cause for the


rejection of continental drift―a cause


that has been largely ignored because


we consider Wegener’s theory to have


been validated by the theory of plate


(50)      tectonics―is the nature of the evidence


that was put forward to support it.  Most


of Wegener’s evidence consisted of


homologies—similarities of patterns and


forms based on direct observations of


(55)      rocks in the field, supported by the use


of hammers, hand lenses, and field note-


books.  In contrast, the data supporting


plate tectonics were impressively


geophysical—instrumental determinations


(60)      of the physical properties of Earth gar-


nered through the use of seismographs,


magnetometers, and computers.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q24:


The author cites Hallam (line 42) on the ice ages primarily in order to




  • provide an example of a geologic phenomenon whose precise causes are not fully understood by geologists today

  • criticize the geological community for an apparent lack of consistency in its responses to new theories

  • offer evidence held to undermine a common view of why Wegener’s theory was not accepted in its day

  • give an example of a modern scientist who believes that Wegener’s theory was rejected because it failed to adequately explain the mechanical basis of continental drift

  • support Gould’s rationale for why Wegener’s theory was rejected by most geologists in the early twentieth century

  • Answer:


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q25:


    The author of the passage refers to the “considerable overlap” (line 23) between continental drift theory and plate tectonics theory most probably in order to




  • suggest that plate tectonics theory is derived from Wegener’s work

  • introduce a discussion comparing the elements of the two theories

  • examine the question of whether continental drift theory was innovative in its time

  • provide a reason why it might seem surprising that continental drift theory was not more widely embraced by geologists

  • cite an explanation that has been frequently offered for Wegener’s high standing among geologists today

  • 答案为:C,可是感觉D更好啊


    Most geologists and many historians today believe that Wegener’s theory was rejected because of its lack of an adequate mechanical basis.


    D 不是正好说明这句话?


    Q25:


    The author of the passage refers to the “considerable overlap” (line 23) between continental drift theory and plate tectonics theory most probably in order to




  • suggest that plate tectonics theory is derived from Wegener’s work

  • introduce a discussion comparing the elements of the two theories

  • examine the question of whether continental drift theory was innovative in its time

  • provide a reason why it might seem surprising that continental drift theory was not more widely embraced by geologists

  • cite an explanation that has been frequently offered for Wegener’s high standing among geologists today

  • 答案为:D


    请问怎么判断答案?

    沙发
    发表于 2004-12-17 12:47:00 | 只看该作者
    24选C,注意41行的However是对   Most geologists and many historians

    today believe that Wegener’s theory


    (35)     was rejected because of its lack of an


    adequate mechanical basis.的转折,你是不是看成问Stephen


    Jay Gould例子的作用了?


    25.


    Yet



    despite the considerable overlap



    between Wegener’s concepts and the



    (25)      later widely embraced plate tectonics



    theory, and despite the fact that conti-



    nental drift theory presented a possible



    solution to the problem of the origin of



    mountains at a time when existing expla-



    (30)      nations were seriously in doubt, in its



    day Wegener’s theory was rejected



    by the vast majority of geologists.



    这里是讲为什么当时地质学家都不接受W的理论,即使这个理论怎么样怎么样的!因为这个理论怎么样怎么样,但是不被接受,所以比较supprising


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-17 12:50:15编辑过]
    板凳
    发表于 2004-12-25 02:47:00 | 只看该作者

    对于2楼对24题的解释真的不是很明白。这题我也是选A,当时在A,C中选,最后选A是因为不喜欢C中的common view,因为从文中我们不会知道这是不是common。还有就是与2楼所说的相反,如果问的是“Stephen ay Gould例子”,我会选C。

    不知我说的有没有道理,好想听多些大家的意见

    地板
    发表于 2005-2-23 19:31:00 | 只看该作者

    其實從原文的L7~L8就可以看出common view了

    a similar theory was rejected by the

    geological community.(英解.the public, people in general)

    這裡應該就可以看出來了吧

    5#
    发表于 2005-7-25 20:31:00 | 只看该作者

    24题:同意rings的说法,我觉得实际上however引导的转折不正是说明了在缺乏有力explanation之前ice ages还是被完全接受,而否定了most geologists and many historians today believe that Wegener’s theory was rejected because of its lack of an adequate mechanical basis.这里G的argument和例子都是most geologists and many historians观点的延续啊。


    25题:despite是一种强对比关系,W的观点有诸多优点,却被拒绝接受,considerable overlap和其他的despite后的内容一样,明显是在强调这个paradox.


    再来看其他答案:


    A. although the similarities between two theories are listed, the passage nowhere suggests that the widely accepted theory is derived from W’s work.


    B. although the comparison is made between the two theories, the comparison by itself  does not appear the aim.


    C.no information of innovation is discussed in the passage


    E, apparently, the considerable overlap is not an explanaiton.


    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-25 20:32:58编辑过]
    6#
    发表于 2005-9-30 22:22:00 | 只看该作者

    25题的d选项还是不明白


    觉得overlap就是解释w为什么不被接受


    但是d的表述是为什么w的不被接受是很surprising的


    这个因果我就不明白,怎么也不明白

    7#
    发表于 2005-10-13 22:26:00 | 只看该作者

    你试试这样想:既然两者有如此多的overlap,为什么W的观点就不被地质学家们接受呢

    8#
    发表于 2007-1-29 02:38:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用ayang1017在2005-9-30 22:22:00的发言:

    觉得overlap就是解释w为什么不被接受

    这题我也想了好久,不是因为OVERLAP才不被接受

    D是说两个理论OVERLAP---->W's work应该是对的----->当时的人不接受这个理论看似奇怪

    9#
    发表于 2007-7-1 20:57:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用kathytc在2007-1-29 2:38:00的发言:

    这题我也想了好久,不是因为OVERLAP才不被接受

    D是说两个理论OVERLAP---->W's work应该是对的----->当时的人不接受这个理论看似奇怪

    看到这题讨论的很少,说说我的意见吧:)

    的确是一道很绕的题,说话拐弯抹角的,我平日最痛恨这种表达方式~~~!!

    所幸,我的In order to题基本都能做对,其他的。。。就惨不忍睹了。。。

    这题要结合第一段语境,揣摩作者的态度。

    Here we go^^^^^^^^^^

    L13:W(人)的××理论是impressive和prescient的(作者正态度)

                                      |

    L 23:Yet (然而,转折)despite..(W与later widely embraced PT理论重合)...,and despite...CD理论怎么怎么好...(由present,solution可知是正态度)...., 但是W还是被广大geologists reject~   (W多不容易啊~)

                                     

    好了,问作者提到“Overlap”是为了什么?

    再简化一下上面的框架,我带点感情色彩来描述看是不是容易懂些:W是不错的,尽管他与PT理论重合,尽管CD理论展现的事实也不错,但大多数人就是不承认W,所以,CD理论(continental drift theory)着实不错,就是因为有重合的地方所以被W拖后腿了,不然可以更widely embraced的……(怎么说着有点像杨二点评快男的语气~“楚生啊,你真是不错,但就是太照顾厉娜了不然可以发挥得更好的……云云)

    因此,回到问题,作者提到Overlap是为了指出,continental drif theory本来可以更广泛的接受的,所以这个看起来奇怪的现象就有了答案(罪魁祸首都是W!)

    注:以上杨二点评为本人自创,得罪粉丝们不要介意~考G也要轻松一下~

    10#
    发表于 2007-7-7 21:44:00 | 只看该作者

    对于24题

    我认可C

    但是对于B的排除存在疑问,大家讨论一下

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 06:37
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部