一道邏輯題，有點搞不清楚，麻煩版主能幫忙

dinino66328 · 发表于 2003-7-27 14:37:00

一道邏輯題，有點搞不清楚，麻煩版主能幫忙
We are warned that climate changes are destined to reduce food production. More hopeful experts claim that food production will change very little because there is little reason to expect altered rain distribution even with climatic changes. For most crops, annual fluctuation and agricultural technology mask yield changes due to climate.
The more hopeful claims are based on which of the following assumptions?

A) Technology is so influential that regardless of climate, improved yields are unlikely.

B) Climate changes cannot be predicted with accuracy.

C) Temperature trends are more predictable than rainfall trends.

D) Cooling trends threaten food production more than warming trends.

E) Climate changes would be more damaging if rainfall patterns are coupled with them.
The answer is E , why?

mike1999 · 发表于 2003-7-27 19:06:00

最后一句的m是什么?

dinino66328 · 发表于 2003-7-27 20:50:00

不好意思最後一句如下
Climate changes would be more damaging if rainfall patterns are coupled with them.

dinino66328 · 发表于 2003-7-28 17:16:00

有人可以幫幫我嗎

Dreamer · 发表于 2003-7-28 18:32:00

这题不算难。只要了解问题是什么：较乐观的专家是根据什么假设得出他们的结论的？

文章中的第二句话：较乐观的专家声称，粮食产量的变化不大，因为即使气候发生变化，也没有根据推测雨量分布会有骤然的变化。

E的内容：气候变化伴随着雨量的变化会对粮食产量造成更大的影响。

如果E成立，文章中的第二句话便成立。

不知道我的解释是否清楚？

dinino66328 · 发表于 2003-7-28 20:06:00

原來是這樣唷
還真是彎來彎去的，真不好懂
謝啦

Dreamer · 发表于 2003-7-30 09:01:00

重要的是读懂文章内容

一道邏輯題，有點搞不清楚，麻煩版主能幫忙

一道邏輯題，有點搞不清楚，麻煩版主能幫忙

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()