|
In Wareland last year, 16 percent of licensed driversunder 21 and 11 percent of drivers ages 21-24 were in serious accidents. Bycontrast, only 3 percent of licensed drivers 65 and older were involved in seriousaccidents. These figures clearly show that the greater experience and developedhabits of caution possessed by drivers in the 65-and-older group make them farsafer behind the wheel than the younger drivers are.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Drivers 65 and older do not, on average,drive very many fewer miles per year than drivers 24 and younger. (C) Drivers 65 and older are less likely than aredrivers 24 and younger to drive during weather conditions that greatly increasethe risk of accidents.
Ｃ選項我知道還沒取非之前是排除他因所以可以直接刪除。但取非之後反而讓我想不透！！！！！！！！
取非之後變成：
我的理解是：65歲的司機比24歲以下司機更有可能在天氣條件惡劣的時候開車。
不知這樣理解是否有錯誤？
而當初推理是：經驗多所以開車比較安全。
論點是經驗多。
那麼Ｃ選項取非之後年紀大的司機比24歲以下的司機更有可能在惡劣天氣中開車。
那麼不就加強了是因為經驗多所以開車安全嗎？？？？？？？
所以主要是因為Ｃ選項取非後變成加強所以才錯的嗎？求高人指點謝謝。
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2018-12-21 16:05:50
收藏
收藏
楼主
