In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government that are open to the public. Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide? A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers. B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public. C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does. D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking. E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
对楼上的就是那么难,答案和原来讨论的不同,麻烦你不回答也不用这种口气,谢谢。 Reasoning What could make the petition misleading to voters who assumed its purpose was to extend local antismoking ordinances statewide? The petition would mislead such voters if it were not intended to help extend local antismoking ordinances statewide as the voters assumed. The information provided suggests that the petition does genuinely support statewide smoking restriction and that the campaign workers are describing it accurately. But the petition could still mislead the voters if the proposed statewide smoking restriction would actually weaken local smoking ordinances. A. This is a reason to support a smoking ban, not a reason why a petition to implement such a ban would be misleading. B. Voters who assume that the ban would extend local ordinances might not assume that the ban would have a huge impact in rural areas. C. Correct. If the proposed law would supersede and weaken local ordinances, then it would not extend them statewide as the voters assume. Therefore, the petition would be misleading. D. This suggests that most voters would support a statewide smoking ban, not that a petition to implement such a ban would be misleading. E. E This suggests that the state law would be compatible with local ordinances, just as voters who think that the law would extend those ordinances would assume. The correct answer is C.