- UID
- 1400078
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2019-4-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
求助一道veritas逻辑题，题目如下：It is well known that many homeless people frequent public libraries as a kind of sanctuary. Now, several dozen public libraries across the country have made their facilities more useful to homeless people by offering free job training programs, for adults and free activities for homeless children. While the administrators of these libraries mean well, the homeless do not pay property taxes to support the library, so these people are getting something for nothing, a dangerous practice for all concerned.Which of the following is assumed by the author of this argument?
A. None of the sales tax paid by homeless people who use the free services is used by the libraries.
B. The general public that uses the libraries does not mind the services provided to the homeless.
C. Many of the homeless people who use public libraries as sanctuaries check the library’s local newspapers for job listings.
D. Some libraries that offer programs to the homeless cannot afford these programs.
E. Property taxes are used predominantly to support public libraries.
当时做的时候就很纠结，A和E纠结了半天因为E property tax与原文更相关所以选了E结果错了，OA是A
题目逻辑链：P: 为无家可归者造福利虽好，但他们不交财产税。C：这样做对利益相关者很危险。
不交财产税和危险中间存在gap，所以我判断假设的方向就是财产税支持着图书馆运营。A取非是这些无家可归者支付的消费税被图书馆使用，看似很有道理可以削弱结论，但再一想，都无家可归了哪还消费得起啊？我有家可归都消费不起，天天吃土，然后就当机立断地排了。而且E完美的填上了gap，取非财产税不是图书馆的主要经济支持，这样他们交不交财产税也就所谓了，完美！后来我想出了一种解释就是图书馆推出了这种就业辅导促进了就业然后无家可归的人就有工作了，有工作就能赚钱了，赚钱就可以消费了，消费就要交税，交的税就被图书馆用了，所以就不危险了。但我总觉得这是过度推理，在考场上也没有那么多时间想这么多，所以还是觉得E好一些。
本人实战两次V分别35，36，ESR的CR部分正确率91%，我自认为逻辑还凑合，但这题真的给我整懵了。还求各位大神指点迷津。
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2019-12-9 07:13:04
收藏
收藏
楼主
