Some public health advocates have become concerned that directly advertising prescription drugs to consumers is likely to cause some patients to pursue certain medications that may be inappropriate for their individual health situation. However, marketing to consumers should not be limited as long as physicians also continue to be educated about such medications, because a physician's prescription is still required in order for patients to obtain these drugs.
Which of the following facts would most directly address the concern articulated by the public health advocates?
| ![]() | After a certain number of years, prescription drugs lose patent protection and other companies can then manufacture and market generic forms of the drugs. | | ![]() | Consumers can now find technical drug information on the Internet, information that previously would have been available only to physicians. | | ![]() | Physicians are also exposed to prescription drug advertisements that are directed toward consumers. | | ![]() | Physicians are not susceptible to pressure from patients in determining appropriate courses of treatment. | | ![]() | Fewer than 15% of patients are likely to remember and ask by name for specific drugs that they see advertised in magazines or on television. |
这道题我觉得BC说的也有道理啊…… 我个人感觉这是因果推理模式题目
∵病人获得要的时候还是要医生的处方 ∴不用担心广告给消费者的影响。
那么要削弱这个因果推理,要么说削弱前提的可信度→即说明,医生的处方受到广告的影响(C),要么说病人不用处方就能获得药(B)
麻烦大家帮我看一下……这个推理有什么问题呢???
|