- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy. The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by (A)impugning the credentials of an opponent 并没有“驳斥可信度”
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle 没有支持一个理论
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy” 没有提到民主的定义,而是the spirit of democracy,很有迷惑性
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view 这些管制是以“民主”的名义,但是它们实际上却违背了“民主”的精神
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience 跟爱国主义无关
|
|