OG16-23 关于平行

Evelyn_ho · 发表于 2015-8-29 09:31:13

Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as  a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation,torminess,and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.
A.Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as  a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,
B.Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as  its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,
C.Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,
D.The dscussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on  the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,
E..The dscussion of greenhouse effects has  usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,

OA:C
错选E
C和E最大的区别是最后那里： to what extent VS.the extent that is,
答案认为，C中whether...warmer和to what extent是平行的，还是第一次看到这样的平行。。。而且to what extent( Earth would get warmer)应该是省略这一部分吧？
E中，that没有先行词，我觉得经过OG某道新题之后发现已经不能像之前那样对待that了...不过在这里再想一下，that试图指代的是Earth would grow warmer，而这个在whether的结构之内，故无法，还是说extent的用法就是not idiomatic?

希望有人可以指正一下我的思路，谢谢！

一个喂马任 · 发表于 2015-9-7 00:05:31

我觉得楼主关于省略的理解是正确的。
“whether Earth would grow warmer” // "what extent ( Earth would get warmer) to" 完美~
然后ron说过 not allowed to end modifiers with prep. 所以就变成正确答案的样子了：
“whether Earth would grow warmer” // "to what extent ( Earth would get warmer)"

再引用ron的列子意会一下平行
what he knows and who spoke to him --> parallel
what he knows and the people who spoke to him --> nope
the things he knows and who spoke to him --> nope
the things he knows and the people who spoke to him --> parallel (two normal nouns)

Evelyn_ho · 发表于 2015-8-30 09:59:37

自己顶一下，help

jenny19931025 · 发表于 2015-8-30 10:20:27

我刚刚特地去查了朗文词典里面有一种用法是 the extent to which=how much 除了这，就没有extent 后面加引导从句的词啦。而且extent很少后面直接加东西的我看词典上都是extent of 顶多。
不知道说的对不对，希望对你有帮助，加油~

Evelyn_ho · 发表于 2015-8-30 11:00:59

jenny19931025 发表于 2015-8-30 10:20
我刚刚特地去查了朗文词典里面有一种用法是 the extent to which=how much 除了这，就没有extent 后面加引 ...

谢谢你！

Evelyn_ho · 发表于 2015-9-7 01:59:00

一个喂马任发表于 2015-9-7 00:05
我觉得楼主关于省略的理解是正确的。
“whether Earth would grow warmer” // "what extent ( Earth would ...

谢谢！！很好的回复！

葫芦屯屯委书记 · 发表于 2015-9-16 10:59:37

刚好有同样的问题，直接看到楼上有大牛回复，谢谢啦

ykh2355 · 发表于 2015-12-15 17:22:05

有没有大神能帮忙解释一下B选项中的what the extent would be怎么不对了，OG里面的解释说不知道这个extent指代什么是什么意思？

shixianxxjj · 发表于 2016-3-29 16:37:06

求问如果将D改为the extent to which it might对不对

医生吃鱼 · 发表于 2016-3-29 20:06:56

shixianxxjj 发表于 2016-3-29 16:37
求问如果将D改为the extent to which it might对不对

恐怕不行。原因有二：

一、句意不同。

分析下正确选项中：focus on 。。。to what extent （Earth would grow warmer）

focus on+what引导的宾语从句。这个宾语从句和单单的the extent还是有区别的。

二、平行错
to which it might中省略了谓语和宾语，在and左边找不到被省略的谓语和宾语。

OG16-23 关于平行

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()