ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2101|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD7-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-25 17:42:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD7-5

Historians who study European
    women of the Renaissance try to mea-
    sure “independence,” “options,” and
Line    other indicators of the degree to which
  (5)    the expression of women’s individuality
was either permitted or suppressed.
Influenced by Western individualism,
these historians define a peculiar form
of personhood:  an innately bounded
 (10)    unit, autonomous and standing apart
from both nature and society.  An
anthropologist, however, would contend
that a person can be conceived in ways
other than as an “individual.”  In many
 (15)    societies a person’s identity is not
intrinsically unique and self-contained
but instead is defined within a complex
web of social relationships.
      In her study of the fifteenth-century
 (20)    Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a
historian who specializes in European
women of the Renaissance attributes
individual intention and authorship of
    actions to her subject.  This historian
 (25)    assumes that Alessandra had goals
and interests different from those of her
sons, yet much of the historian’s own
research reveals that Alessandra
acted primarily as a champion of her
 (30)    sons’ interests, taking their goals as
her own.  Thus Alessandra conforms
more closely to the anthropologist’s
    notion that personal motivation is
embedded in a social context.  Indeed,
 (35)    one could argue that Alessandra did
    not distinguish her personhood from
that of her sons.  In Renaissance
Europe the boundaries of the con-
ceptual self were not always firm
 (40)    and closed and did not necessarily
coincide with the boundaries of
the bodily self.

In the first paragraph, the author of the passage mentions a contention that would be made by an anthropologist most likely in order to
       
A present a theory that will be undermined in the discussion of a historian’s study later in the passage
B offer a perspective on the concept of personhood that can usefully be applied to the study of women in Renaissance Europe
C undermine the view that the individuality of European women of the Renaissance was largely suppressed
D argue that anthropologists have applied the Western concept of individualism in their research
E lay the groundwork for the conclusion that Alessandra’s is a unique case among European women of the Renaissance whose lives have been studied by historians
Answer b
请教高手     我看到之前的讨论还是不理解为什么选B 请高手指点一下,谢谢
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-26 10:49:00 | 只看该作者
顶自己一下,希望高手伸出援手,谢谢
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-27 20:14:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-28 20:13:00 | 只看该作者
盼大家帮忙,谢过
5#
发表于 2009-3-14 04:18:00 | 只看该作者

我也来顶,不知道为什么B正确?

为什么AD错?

请NN能给简单翻译这篇文章吗?这篇文章说了很多,好像没什么具体的,,晕了。。。

6#
发表于 2009-3-14 15:29:00 | 只看该作者

前面先说有些历史学家怎么怎么,提出怎样的观点,然后:

An anthropologist, however, would contend
that a person can be conceived in ways
other than as an “individual.” 

注意这里的however,这是一个转折,从negative转向topic:下面的一句接上这一句就提出了新的观点。

7#
发表于 2012-9-23 22:35:52 | 只看该作者
同问啊!!!!!前后不是转折关系么?????????
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-15 00:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部