ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5376|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助:OG10 195,173题 LAWYER解释

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-18 12:06:00 | 只看该作者

求助:OG10 195,173题 LAWYER解释

195. A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.

Change to FITL à deduction to charitable and EI.

Wealthy individual would no longer …

A+Bà C: many charitable and EI would have to reduce …

 

L à reduce money à reduce service

 

IMP: wealthy individual; FITL,

 

The argument above assumes which of the following?

(A) Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.

Not weaken. W/O L à keep money à would not reduce service.

Irrelevant without law instead of changes of law,

(B) Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.

Only source. Support.

(C) The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.

Irrelevant the primary reason…

(D) Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.

Only individuals. Not only à keep money à would not reduce service; not weaken
                
A

(E) Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.

Irrelevant law change,
                    

 按照LAWYER的分析,A和D都对.NOT WEAKEN。。请教..

173. Researchers have found that when very overweight people, who tend to have relatively low metabolic rates, lose weight primarily through dieting, their metabolisms generally remain unchanged. They will thus burn significantly fewer calories at the new weight than do people whose weight is normally at that level. Such newly thin persons will, therefore, ultimately regain weight until their body size again matches their metabolic rate.

 

P: overweight people, M unchanged àburn fewer C at the new weight than other people

C: new thin person would regain weight

 

IMP: burn fewer C; M unchanged; regain weight

 

The conclusion of the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Relatively few very overweight people who have dieted down to a new weight tend to continue to consume substantially fewer calories than do people whose normal weight is at that level.

If do so, thin person would not regain weight. Few people could keep, Correct.

(B) The metabolisms of people who are usually not overweight are much more able to vary than the metabolisms of people who have been very overweight.

Irrelevant M of people are not overweight

(C) The amount of calories that a person usually burns in a day is determined more by the amount that is consumed that day than by the current weight of the individual.

Irrelevant amount of C

(D) Researchers have not yet determined whether the metabolic rates of formerly very overweight individuals can be accelerated by means of chemical agents.

Irrelevant another open possibility
                        

(E) Because of the constancy of their metabolic rates, people who are at their usual weight normally have as much difficulty gaining weight as they do losing it.

Irrelevant the constancy of their M R

这道题完全不懂...A为什么是对的...


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/18 12:21:03编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-10-18 19:46:00 | 只看该作者
173题A是说,超重的人在体重达到正常人水平后,每日消耗的卡路里不会比正常人每日消耗的卡路里少很多。 

取非越弱: 如果超重的人成功减肥后,还能够比正常人吃进很少的卡路里 (如果和正常人吃进一样的话,因为他们的代谢没变,会重新变胖),那么就有可能保持住减肥成果。
板凳
发表于 2009-10-19 12:15:00 | 只看该作者

195应该选A 对A 取反 存在一些人这些规定照样捐钱 反正有钱不在乎 那么这些店就不会关门 取非结论

 D不对 如果假设除了富豪们没人捐款了 取非有人捐款 但不是富豪 他们肯定要受这个DEDUCTION的影响 所以完全有可能支持结论的

第2题对A取反,存在很多胖子消费能量比非胖子多 削弱了结论 结论是胖子通过减肥达不到效果


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/19 12:24:19编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-23 21:53:00 | 只看该作者

多谢大侠指教,那个173题的第二个单词 few要怎么翻译呢.....这个不是表示部分否定的意思么?那后面那个  胖人消耗卡路里比非胖人少 岂不是要被否定了么~~

多谢多谢~~

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-23 21:55:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(sunjin1988)195应该选A 对A 取反 存在一些人...

多谢大侠指教,那个173题的第二个单词 few要怎么翻译呢.....这个不是表示部分否定的意思么?那后面那个  胖人消耗卡路里比非胖人少 岂不是要被否定了么~~

多谢多谢~~

6#
发表于 2010-6-23 16:58:34 | 只看该作者
貌似这题的关键是分清楚burn calories(燃烧热量)和consume calories(摄入热量)的区别?
7#
发表于 2012-9-15 16:39:41 | 只看该作者
确实绕口,查了MANHATTON,试着解释下吧,同意楼上的观点,
(A) Relatively few very overweight people who have dieted down to a new weight tend to continue to consume substantially fewer calories than do people whose normal weight is at that level.

A--排除一种可能,Relatively few是否定,句子意思为,没有一个超重的人减肥以后倾向于继续吃比相同体重的正常人少的热量,没吃热量即使新城代谢弱也不会回复体重呀,所以排除这种可能--吃的少,那么就保证了继续增胖的可能
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 21:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部