ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2221|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og12 112题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-6 22:55:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
112. TheaveragehourlywageoftelevisionassemblersinVernlandhaslongbeensignificantlylowerthanthatin neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
(B) Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
(C) The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
(D) The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
(E) The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.

答案c。
疑问:题中已经给出条件说b国的电视装配工数量少了,要求找出一答案使b国的电视总产量下降,这样v国的电视就能卖到b国。由于装配工的数量减少,只要b国现有的装配工的工作效率 “不提高” 即可保证b国电视数量减少。但c答案中怎么说not decrease”???
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-12-6 23:17:24 | 只看该作者
时间长 效率低
两者是反比
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-6 23:34:33 | 只看该作者
谢谢啊,明白了
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-6 23:35:22 | 只看该作者
谢谢啊,明白了
5#
发表于 2011-12-13 11:40:36 | 只看该作者
啊明白了!hours decrease=efficiency increase!
6#
发表于 2012-5-9 09:31:39 | 只看该作者
28、背景:自行车商的技术保护反映了他们尽力去满足的需求状况。
因为:对自行车创新感兴趣并且会购买创新车的唯一客户就是自行车运动员。
所以:自行车技术创新会受到政府设定的比赛用车标准的限制。
问题:假设。
选项:A:便宜车市场不会扩张,除非比赛用车市场扩张
       B:高级车会得到改进,是因为小厂的技术创新,而不是因为大厂的技术创新
       C:自行车运动员不会大量购买比赛标准之外的车
       D:车商的技术保护,是因为他们想造出一款不改变就能适应不同市场的车
       E:制定比赛用车标准的部门,不关心自行车创新
7#
发表于 2012-5-9 09:34:56 | 只看该作者
。。。回错了。。。删了把。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 15:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部