ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4728|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全-5-19题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-4 13:51:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全-5-19题

19. Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in the category of low-paying service occupations. This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, whereas the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.


If the estimates above are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn?


(A) In 1982 more people were working in low-paying service occupations than were working in high-paying service occupations.


(B) In 1995 more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.


(C) Nonservice occupations will account for the same share of total employment in 1995 as in 1982.


(D) Many of the people who were working in low-paying service occupations in 1982 will be working in high-paying service occupations by 1995.A


(E) The rate of growth for low-paying service occupations will be greater than the overall rate of employment growth between 1982 and 1995.



答案为什麽是A呢?想不通,D 怎麽不对呢?


沙发
发表于 2004-5-4 15:25:00 | 只看该作者

簡單整理一下题目 :

3年内

投入 low-paying service 人数 (注意 是数量) 占整体的比例  the same

  high-paying service人数 (题目没交代)    占整体的比例  

雖然題目沒有說明,但現實生活中這種數據上的變化,應該不可能是同一批人上的異動,新增加了勞動人口影響了整體數據分析的可能性較大

(D)選項我試著用數據算來算去….都算不出一個合理的數字來

不知harvardstudent 選(D) 的想法是???
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-4 23:02:00 | 只看该作者

就像你所说的那样变化,我想的是既然low pay数量增加,但比率没变,而high pay 比例增加,可能是因为原先一部分 low pay人转成了high pay, 这样,即使新的low pay 仍然在增加,而原先那部分已不再是high pay了。不知说明白了吗?


关键是谁能解释一下为甚麽是A呢?应该怎样理解A的 逻辑呢?


地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-5 10:12:00 | 只看该作者

怎没没人帮忙解释一下呀?

谁能帮我解释一下呀?

5#
发表于 2004-5-5 10:31:00 | 只看该作者
From low pay to high pay? Where in the question can you find any fact or hint that warrants such thoughts? One key in RC is not to bring in your own assumptions. This question is about absolute number and relative percentage. That's it. When absolute # increases, the percentage does not necessarily follow.
6#
发表于 2004-5-5 14:04:00 | 只看该作者

Mindfree说滴真是好耶 ! 不知 harvardstudent 是否弄明白噜?

也就是说  If the estimates above are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn?

刚刚又想了一下 ,这么说吧 (D) 有可能是(A)的第二层推论    <个人观点请nn指正>

你要不要朝这个方向再思索一下

可别掉进胡同里噜

ETS的CR最高指导原则之一是à别想太远啦……

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-5 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

Mindfree 说的是,我也明白绝对值变化不一定导致相对值变化,但是我还是不明白A的思路.(我可能真的钻进胡同出不来了) 大家帮我具体分析一下应该怎样推理出这道题的结论吧.  

另外,B也是在说绝对值变化怎麽不对呢? (看来我最近变得愚钝了)

8#
发表于 2004-5-9 22:32:00 | 只看该作者
我也知道绝对值增加相对值不一定增加, 可是A增加的绝对值远大于B增加的绝对值, 而相对值却是B的增大了, 谁能给举个数字的例子, 我想不通, 更别说选A了
9#
发表于 2004-5-10 23:49:00 | 只看该作者

此题,我也没有想通,绝对与相对数量的问题,举例说明:





















1982,number 1982 share 1995 number 1995 share
low-paying 100 80% 100+?=?
high-paying 25 20% ... ...

谁能举个例子~~~

10#
发表于 2004-5-10 23:55:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-12 09:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部