Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.
Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it
A.Attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B.Mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C.Attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D.Simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E.Assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group
请问一下那位能解释一下A到底怎么对的么？谢谢
因为我觉得如果是A的话，应该解释为将适用条件的样本扩大，可是这么发过来看Mel也犯了同样的错误了啊。困扰啊
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-12-25 16:52:51
收藏
收藏
楼主
