ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1492|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-2-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-7 06:16:00 | 只看该作者

大全-2-8

8.     By analyzing the garbage of a large number of average-sized households, a group of modern urban anthropologists has found that a household discards less food the more standardized—made up of canned and prepackaged foods—its diet is. The more standardized a household’s diet is, however, the greater the quantities of fresh produce the household throws away.


Which of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?


(A) An increasing number of households rely on a highly standardized diet.


(B) The less standardized a household’s diet is, the more nonfood waste the household discards.无关


(C) The less standardized a household’s diet is, the smaller is the proportion of fresh produce in the household’s food waste.


(D) The less standardized a household’s diet is, the more canned and prepackaged foods the household discards as waste.C


(E) The more fresh produce a household buys, the more fresh produce it throws away.无关


食物越标准,扔的新鲜东西多


如何能得出答案C呢


我认为只能得到


食物越不标准 扔的新鲜东西越少


可是C是 The less standardized a household’s diet is, the smaller is the proportion of fresh produce in the household’s food waste.


讲的是比例



不明白 能讲讲吗  谢谢


沙发
发表于 2004-8-7 09:46:00 | 只看该作者

这是一个数学关系题。我觉得infer题最重要是看清题目关系,而不要以选项的关键字排除。因为infer是可以infer出题干所没有的信息的。

more standadized the food is---->discard less food;

more standadized the food is---->throw away more fresh product.

由以上两个premise,知道食物越不标准,扔的东西越多;并且食物越不标准,扔的新鲜食物越少。那当总的垃圾增多了之后,而新鲜食物垃圾反而少了,是不是新鲜食物的比例就少了呢?

这两个premise所讲的都不是具体数字,而是模糊数字。所以说比例是正常的。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-7 09:59:00 | 只看该作者
thank u ,arundhati . I got it .
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 10:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部