还是问狒狒逻辑的一题。

cycgundam · 发表于 2012-7-27 10:46:38

107. Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

A.   It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
B.   Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
C.   If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
D.   Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
E.   If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

答案为何是E？

原文中并没有建立起20%的percent和bankrupt的联系。20%的percent只是题目中后半段的一个陈述。

cycgundam · 发表于 2012-7-29 04:07:06

拜托这道题谁能分析分析看看？~多谢~~~

文静1229 · 发表于 2012-7-29 16:35:05

狒狒的逻辑题的解析中提到了：
市场的改造——》Q要增加产量
但是如果产量不增加，就会破产

而答案E中提到20%不可以达到，其实就是在回应题目中的后半句的产量的提高是不可以达到的。。。。

（如果还是不清楚，就实在不好意思了啊，我也不知道该这么说会清楚点）

还是问狒狒逻辑的一题。

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()