ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12385|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教:大全-5-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-11 23:36:00 | 只看该作者

请教:大全-5-20

20.   For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?



(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.

(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.C

(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

这道题在说的什么呀?我怎么一点出摸不着头脑。


沙发
发表于 2004-3-12 11:13:00 | 只看该作者
I hope this is helpful:


政府把所有的工人罢工视为非法是一种代价高昂的错误,因为这样所有的劳动纠纷都必须通过仲裁来解决,而仲裁员们得不到任何已商定的公共部门劳动纠纷和解方案的指引。 只有当涉及到服务无法被替代的公共部门的工人时,罢工才应该被定为非法。

板凳
发表于 2004-3-12 11:15:00 | 只看该作者
First of all, you'd better adjust the size of fonts. The words is too small to be recognized.


arbitrition->increase in cost, therefore the arbitrition should be adopted only if there is no alternative.


C explains that the arbitrition will favor the public-sector side, therefore prove that arbitrition brings about increase in cost.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-12 19:09:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上两位,在你们的帮助下我弄清了题目的大致意思,是不是说public sector的工人工作很重要,又无其它人可以代替他们,因此地方政府宁愿让他们采用仲裁的方式(虽然costly)解决劳资纠纷,也不愿意他们罢工(因为这样损失更大)。而工人们也愿意如此。请指教。
5#
发表于 2011-12-1 20:45:32 | 只看该作者
这个翻译看的不是很懂
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 08:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部