ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1120|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【语法求助】比较中的概念对等问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-6 23:58:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

A.movies—less than those

B.movies—fewer than have been

C.movies, which is less than those

D.movies, a number lower than the people(B)

E.movies, fewer than the ones

实在是被搞得很火大了。。。我真的很难理解什么才叫做比较对象对等?
是seven people ?还是people?还是number?
每次做这种题目都会错,哪位NN有没有好一点的方法点播我一二啊?楼主跪谢了!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-7 00:52:13 | 只看该作者
07版语法笔记中有说到in addition to A, B 中,A,B不需要是同一类对象
但是08版中有一题:
OG10-19. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
(A) the protein in rice is higher quality than that in
(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in
(C) the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in
(D) rice protein is higher in quality than it is in
(E) rice has a protein higher in quality than

In this sentence, the initial clause modifies the nearest noun, identifying it as the thing being compared with wheat. By making protein the noun modified, choices A, C, and D illogically compare wheat with protein(是指In addition to having more protein than wheat does这个从句里面) and claim that the protein in rice has more protein than wheat does. In C and D, the comparative structure higher in quality than it is in wheat absurdly suggests that rice protein contains wheat. B, the best choice, logically compares wheat to rice by placing the noun rice immediately after the initial clause. B also uses that to refer to protein in making the comparison between the proteins of rice and wheat. Choice E needs either that in or does after wheat to make a complete and logical comparison.
红字部分认为ACD是错误的,因为比较对象不对等

那到底in addition to 需不需要对等啊???
板凳
发表于 2011-10-7 02:23:27 | 只看该作者
不晓得你看prep08没有~~~我也不是很懂~~但希望你看了这个有点帮助

比较之庖丁解牛—by cwang
对主谓宾全的句型
主语比较:  A do sth than B do.(AB为对等名词,加do是为了显示这是一个可以发出动作的名词,因而确定是主语,进而确定是主语对比)
介宾比较:  A do sth of C1 by D1 than of C2 by D2.(C1C2,D1D2对等名词)
宾语比较:  A do C1 than C2.(C1C2为对等名词)
状语比较:  A do sth than usual/everbefore/people expected(直接加状语)
ETS就这几下子,原则就是清楚地指示什么跟什么比。
按照这个原理,对下一种句型只有主谓,没有宾语的句子,因为没有宾语,只可能有主语比较,因而不需要重复do来确认这是一个可发出动作的主语,所以其比较形式如下:
I eat faster than you.注意与下句区别
I eat apple faster than you do
如果写成 I eat apple faster than you 按ETS的理解,从语法上就变成我吃苹果比吃你快,成了宾语比较。逻辑上显然不通。
AS族的比较大同小异,as 可单独引导比较,也可以复合成as many as, as hard as 等形式,但ETS宗旨不变,如
Sand road costs twice as many to build as to manintain(类似于介宾比较)
Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,)
Sand road costs the govement twice as many to build as the residents.(宾语比较)
ETS考过AS比较的习惯用法(不受上述限制,如下)
AS poor as they are, they can not afford a car.
They have 800million students, as many as have enrolled in our school.
(注意以上都是用逗号隔开的句子,AS在这里的作用更类似连词,连接一个主句和一个从句)
注意AS有时不表比较的如as you work hard, you will pass the exam.表原因了。
There be 句型等同于一般的主谓宾俱全的句型
OG89
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as there were four years ago(主语比较)
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American  four time as many as  DVD player(宾语比较)
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as for school teachers.(介宾比较)
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as  in china(介宾比较)
以上的纲领代入EST的OG几乎都成立,在我这次实战中也成立,但GWD中有一题是例外的,也就是说并没有放之四海而皆准的真理,清楚,简洁,合理才是ETS的最高宗旨。
地板
发表于 2011-10-7 03:32:29 | 只看该作者
OG 解释的很清楚啊:这里有2个比较
1)in addtion to 需要对等:B中的rice和in addtion to中的wheat对等。
2) B中 :rice has protein of higher quality than that in
wheat。 rice的蛋白质和wheat中的蛋白质对比。所以必须用that指代rice中的蛋白质。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-7 08:54:55 | 只看该作者
谢谢
其实我是很明白语法点的,就是具体到题目的时候经常不知道是谁跟谁在比
就比如说这道比人的,比较的概念是七个人?还是这个数字?还是人?
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-7 08:57:28 | 只看该作者
谢谢,我知道这里面的比较
我疑惑的是在07版语法笔记里面提到过,比较要严格对称,但是有两个短语例外
in addition to和contrary to,不需要一定是对等的概念
但是08版又说in addition to要对称,所以我就纠结了。。。
具体你可以搜一下07版的,搜in addition to看一下那道题
7#
发表于 2011-10-7 22:33:41 | 只看该作者
我觉得in addition to 那个不是比较对等,那个题考的是having的逻辑主语。至于OG解释提到的比较,我认为是指more than的比较要一致。实际上在more than的结构中是having的逻辑主语rice在和wheat作比较。
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-7 22:37:48 | 只看该作者
我觉得in addition to 那个不是比较对等,那个题考的是having的逻辑主语。至于OG解释提到的比较,我认为是指more than的比较要一致。实际上在more than的结构中是having的逻辑主语rice在和wheat作比较。
-- by 会员 血翼蝙蝠拉么 (2011/10/7 22:33:41)



恍然大悟,确实是逻辑主语。。。楼主脑子又抽了。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-5 21:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部