二位道友,呵呵。
因为我以前学过生物,这个题是生物的逻辑题,就是杀虫剂的解决方案,象这几个方案都有分析过,而且都不可行。最好的方案是用生物方法杀虫(扯远了),因为实际上是这样的,如果换杀虫剂,对天敌确实杀伤性非常大,呵呵。所以,不提倡换杀虫剂。换杀虫剂有灭绝的效果。
我觉得这五个题的答案都不合适,比如看下个题,如果按照90题的逻辑
134.
Caterpillars of all species produce an identical hormone called "juvenile hormone" that maintains feeding behavior. Only when a caterpillar has grown to the right size for pupation to take place does a special enzyme halt the production of juvenile hormone. This enzyme can be synthesized and will, on being ingested by immature caterpillars, kill them by stopping them from feeding.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the view that it would not be advisable to try to eradicate agricultural pests that go through a caterpillar stage by spraying croplands with the enzyme mentioned above? (此题与90题矛盾,就参考此题目思路了)
(A) Most species of caterpillar are subject to some natural predation.
(B) Many agricultural pests do not go through a caterpillar stage.
(C) Many agriculturally beneficial insects go through a caterpillar stage.
(D) Since caterpillars of different species emerge at different times, several sprayings would be necessary.
(E) Although the enzyme has been synthesized in the laboratory, no large-scale production facilities exist as yet.
实际上这题最大的问题就是,如果这种杀虫剂对beneficial insects造成大规模杀伤的话,就不好用。
而90题忽略了换杀虫剂(当然是sustained的)所带来的杀伤效果。而且这个效果不好检测,就是说,效果一的破坏和效果二的收益倒底是什么样的,有待考证。
|