ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pesticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide, therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use is likely to become the norm.

which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the argument above?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4071|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 一道考古,不确定答案

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-14 05:29:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-24-29.
Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pesticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide, therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use is likely to become the norm.

Which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the argument above?

A.    Whether plant scientists have developed insect-resistant seeds for every crop that is currently grown commercially
B.    Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in larger amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage.
C.    Whether plants grown from the new genetically engineered seeds can be kept completely free of insect damage.
D.    Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do currently used seeds.
E.    Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar varieties in the past.

感觉应该是B,但是答案是D。

觉得一直谈pesticide,B的话,如果farmers确实用力比唱规的量多的pesticide,那么这个基因产品的优势就不明显,因为这个基因产品本身并不能完全不用杀冲剂,只是想对现在的庄稼用得少很多。

求解释。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-14 07:31:58 | 只看该作者
整篇的主题应该是在讲engineered vegi如何可以节省成本 farmer少用农药可以省钱,消费者会对无农药的支付较高的价格
板凳
发表于 2011-7-8 11:23:21 | 只看该作者
答案选B
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-488304-1-1.html?postid=14379783&searchmode=TopicContent&searchtext=scientists%20resistant
地板
发表于 2011-7-9 13:33:21 | 只看该作者
选D的
那个少用农药看成是减少管理成本和加强售卖竞争力的原因。
要点还是在商业上是否有利。
5#
发表于 2012-4-13 12:43:37 | 只看该作者
选D的
那个少用农药看成是减少管理成本和加强售卖竞争力的原因。
要点还是在商业上是否有利。
-- by 会员 mahaofei001 (2011/7/9 13:33:21)


靠谱么???吗啡会回来看么??
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 13:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部