ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2595|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道GWD的逻辑题 求提点

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-9 13:32:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa
became very polluted.Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa
.
C. The bottom of the lake does not contain toxic remnants of earlier pollution that will be stirred into the water by pipeline construction.

D. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa
now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.
答案D为啥不能选呢?一开始就有点在C和D 直接疑惑,求解释~谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-10-9 17:37:06 | 只看该作者
D选项明显是一个加强的 C才是一个assumption嘛
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-11 16:31:38 | 只看该作者
呃...可是如果对鱼的数量造成威胁的还有其他因素这一点不能假定的话,论点也不能成立嘛?.
地板
发表于 2011-10-11 16:56:40 | 只看该作者
lz没看明白d的意思吧,d的意思是   漏油  只能造成 对鱼群数量的损害
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-11 17:07:42 | 只看该作者
哦 是哦 呵呵 谢咯~
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-11 17:09:23 | 只看该作者
那选项A呢?
7#
发表于 2011-10-11 17:16:37 | 只看该作者
a把这里讨论的东西都apart from了,讨论其他的是无关的
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-11 17:38:48 | 只看该作者
了解~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 10:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部