【裸机】狗狗第五只想不通，求指点

sheep-c · 发表于 2011-8-23 11:05:15

5【高血压】
by LBSJodie （660 Q49, V30）
科学家做关于治疗高血压的实验。有两组病人，让他们一组hold breath（好像是），一组朗诵诗歌（汗！）。结果朗诵诗歌的血压下降比较明显，因此朗诵诗歌更有效。
问需要什么条件来support？（我选的是实验后多长时间，他们的血压回复到原来水平）

考古
V1（710）一组实验，二组人都有高血压，一组屏住呼吸，一组大声朗读。结果发现朗读的血压降得要比正常的多，所以研究人员推出，大声朗读是治疗高血压最好方法。evaluate
我选的是，应该知道比较血压在大声朗读和屏住呼吸后，哪个会更快升高。
V2（700）在一群高血压病患中做实验发现屏住呼吸和大声朗读都能降血压。而大声朗读比屏住呼吸降得血压低（还是多？不记得了。。这个貌似很关键= =），所有觉得大声朗读是比屏住呼吸更好的治疗高血压的方式。问评价这个结论需要的条件是。这道题原来机经里有，选项是1.是否屏住呼吸本来就是治疗高血压的方式。2.是否用大声朗读降下血压之后血压回升地比较快。3.两组病人中最高的血压和最低的血压分别是多少。。。我选了3.。。现在想想如果是低。。那我的答案应该是对的。。因为需要知道相对值才能判断。。。如果是多。。呃。
V3 (750) evaluate题：高血压病试验——两组病人，一组秉住呼吸；另一组郎读文学作品，试验发现后者血压下降得更多。因此，郎读作品应该成为一种高血压病的主要疗法。为了evaluate，应该知道：1）秉住呼吸是否已经是疗法；2）正常人郎读作品后的血压变化。我选了2），但是现在想应该是1）。这一题记得比较清楚，其它选项估计都是无关的，大家可以讨论一下这两者改选哪个。
V4 (750) JJ 上提到了，高血压病试验——两组病人，一组秉住呼吸；另一组郎读文学作品，试验发现后者血压下降得更多。因此，郎读作品应该成为一种高血压病的主要疗法。为了evaluate，应该知道：1）秉住呼吸是否已经是疗法；2）正常人郎读作品后的血压变化。确认选1

evaluate是考什么？加强？

Heather_Lau · 发表于 2011-8-23 11:08:31

evaluate应该是strengthen or weaken吧.
evaluate的题一向无力...

sheep-c · 发表于 2011-8-23 11:13:09

。。。。
还有assumption是考什么？

我是菜鸟。。但马上要上场杀G了

sheep-c · 发表于 2011-8-23 11:16:56

从裸机版找到的，大家参考

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】（七) Strengthen and Paradox

Strengthen and weaken are two sides of the same coin: the difference is only the angle from which you look at the same coin(problem).

Prompts leading to strengthen:

? Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
? Which one of the following, if true, most supports the director’s argument?
? Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the teacher’s reasoning?

Prompts that ask you what most justifies the argument are strengthen prompts, while prompts that ask you what justifies the conclusion are sufficient assumption prompts.

Also, prompts that ask you which answer most supports that passage are strengthen prompts, while prompts that ask you which answer is most supported by the passage are most strongly supported prompts. The key difference between them is: what is supporting what; is the passage supposed to support the answer or be supported by the answer?

Approach these strengthen questions just as you would weaken questions except that instead of exploiting the argument’s weakness, you are supposed to use NEW information to buttress the argument or to eliminate the weakness.

Prompt leading to paradox:

? Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the apparent paradox above?
? Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the conflict described above?
? Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively reconcile the discrepancy described above?

Before you look at the answers:

1. Paradox questions usually give two facts that appear incompatible. Single out these two facts.

2. Ask yourself, “Why one of the facts is true, even though the other fact is true as well?” Usually one the facts will fit better after why while the other fact will fit better after even though.

3. Predict a possible answer by answering your “Why . . . even though . . .” question.

Then look for the answer which best explains your “Why . . . even though . . .” question. The correct answer choice must explain why both facts might actually be true without contradicting each other. Some wrong answers will explain why one fact is true without addressing the paradox.

【裸机】狗狗第五只想不通，求指点

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块

【裸机】狗狗第五只 想不通，求指点

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块

【裸机】狗狗第五只想不通，求指点